PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 24, 2026Danube0 citationsOpen Access

From Unity to Fragmentation? OECD Country Groupings During Successive Crises (2019–2024)

DBDiana Bílková

Key Points

  • The research aims to analyze the macroeconomic cohesion and heterogeneity of OECD countries from 2019 to 2024.
  • Used cluster analysis to identify economic, social, and institutional indicators among OECD countries.
  • Assessed differences in wage-setting, governance, and policy uncertainty.
  • Evaluated cluster stability and cohesion across various economic crises.
  • Nordic, Benelux, and Oceania countries maintained high internal cohesion.
  • Central, Southern European, Balkan countries, Israel, and Turkey showed significant variability in cluster membership.
  • The Baltic states demonstrated increased cohesion from 2022, while Latin American OECD members remained dispersed.

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the macroeconomic cohesion and heterogeneity of OECD countries from 2019 to 2024 using cluster analysis based on key economic, social, and institutional indicators. The methodology identifies clusters reflecting similarities in macroeconomic patterns, while accounting for differences in wage-setting, governance, and policy uncertainty. Results show that Nordic, Benelux, and Oceania countries exhibited consistently high internal cohesion, whereas Central, Southern European, Balkan countries, Israel, and Turkey displayed more variable cluster membership, reflecting substantial heterogeneity in economic development. The Baltic states showed increasing cohesion from 2022, while Latin American OECD members remained largely dispersed. Cluster stability varied across years, highlighting descriptive differences rather than causal relationships, but offering insights into responses to overlapping shocks, including pandemics, geopolitical tensions, and climate policy uncertainty. These findings contribute to understanding uneven convergence among advanced economies and provide guidance for policymakers in evaluating macroeconomic stability, structural differences, and resilience under global uncertainty.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Diana Bílková (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1296d548a0ea1665673fdehttps://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2026-0005
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1How do <scp>OECD</scp> countries differ in population ageing and the situation of people aged 65 and older? Evidence using cluster analysis2024
  2. 2Divergent Globalization Paths in Europe: A Dynamic Clustering Approach and Implications for Sustainable Development2025
  3. 3SOM Clustering of OECD Countries for COVID-19 Indicators and Related Socio-economic Indicators2024
  4. 4Assessment of Baltics states regional Economic disparities according to GDP2024
  5. 5From Recession to Pandemic2024