PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 25, 2005Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society57 citationsOpen Access

The monopole moment of the three-point correlation function of the two-degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey

View Full Paper
JPJun PanISIstván Szapudi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We measure the monopole moment of the three-point correlation function on scales 1-70 h -1 Mpc in the two-degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS). Volume-limited samples are constructed using a series of integral magnitude bins between M = -18 to -22. Our measurements with a novel edge-corrected estimator represent most, if not all, three-point level monopole or angular averaged information in the catalogue. We fit a perturbative non-linear bias model to a joint data vector formed from the estimated two-and three-point correlation functions. Two different models are used: an analytic model based on Eulerian perturbation theory including bias and redshift distortions and a phenomenological bias model based on the direct redshift space measurements in the large Virgo simulations. To interpret the clustering results, we perform a three-parameter Gaussian maximum-likelihood analysis. In the canonical -21 to -20 volume-limited sample, we find 8 = 0.93 +0.06 -0.2 , b = 1.04 +0.23 -0.09 and b 2 = -0.06 +0.003 -0.001 . Our estimate of 8 is robust across the different volume-limited samples constructed. These results, based solely on the large-scale clustering of galaxies, are in excellent agreement with previous analyses using the Wilkinson Anisotropy Probe; this is a spectacular success of the concordance model. We also present two-parameter fits for the bias parameters, which are in excellent agreement with the previous findings of the bias evolution in the 2dFGRS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pan et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12974b19b8e1960734fbbchttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09407.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper