PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2018Journal of the American Heart Association152 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in Asians With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

View Full Paper
YCYi‐Hsin ChanLSLai‐Chu SeeHTHui‐Tzu Tu

Key Result

Apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism compared with warfarin (HRs 0.55, 0.82, and 0.81, respectively) in Asian patients.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=73,074)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Do non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) reduce ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and mortality compared to warfarin in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
73,074 Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database
I
Intervention
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban) at standard or low doses
C
Comparator
Warfarin
O
Outcome
Ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE), major bleeding, and all-cause mortalityhard clinical

In a large real-world Asian cohort, NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) were associated with significantly lower risks of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and mortality compared to warfarin.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 0.55 (apixaban), 0.82 (dabigatran), 0.81 (rivaroxaban) (95% CI 0.43-0.69, 0.68-0.98, 0.67-0.97)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are superior to warfarin among Asians with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this nationwide retrospective cohort study collected from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, there were 5843, 20 079, 27 777, and 19 375 nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients taking apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin, respectively, from June 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016. Propensity-score weighting was used to balance covariates across study groups. Patients were followed until the first occurrence of any efficacy or safety outcome or the end date of study. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) comparing apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban with warfarin were: ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE), 0.55 (0.43-0.69), 0.82 (0.68-0.98), and 0.81 (0.67-0.97); major bleeding, 0.41 (0.31-0.53), 0.65 (0.53-0.80), and 0.58 (0.46-0.72); and all-cause mortality, 0.58 (0.51-0.66), 0.61 (0.54-0.68), and 0.57 (0.51-0.65). A total of 3623 (62%), 17 760 (88%), and 26 000 (94%) patients were taking low-dose apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily), dabigatran (110 mg twice daily), and rivaroxaban (10-15 mg once daily), respectively. Similar to all-dose NOACs, all low-dose NOACs had lower risk of IS/SE, major bleeding, and mortality when compared with warfarin. In contrast to other standard-dose NOACs, apixaban was associated with lower risks of IS/SE (0.45 0.31-0.65), major bleeding (0.29 0.18-0.46), and mortality (0.23 0.17-0.31) than warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: All NOACs were associated with lower risk of IS/SE, major bleeding, and mortality compared with warfarin in the largest real-world practice among Asians with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. All low-dose NOACs had lower risk of IS/SE, major bleeding, and mortality when compared with warfarin. Standard-dose apixaban caused a lower risk of IS/SE, major bleeding, and mortality compared with warfarin.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chan et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=73,074). Apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE) (HR 0.55 (apixaban), 0.82 (dabigatran), 0.81 (rivaroxaban), 95% CI 0.43-0.69, 0.68-0.98, 0.67-0.97). Apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism compared with warfarin (HRs 0.55, 0.82, and 0.81, respectively) in Asian patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a129dddc031bb6829a6fba4https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.117.008150
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper