PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 4, 2018Journal of the American Heart Association109 citationsOpen Access

Clinical Significance of Get With the Guidelines–Heart Failure Risk Score in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure After Hospitalization

View Full Paper
SSSatoshi SuzukiAYAkiomi YoshihisaYSYu Sato

Key Result

The GWTG-HF risk score significantly predicted all-cause mortality (HR 1.537; 95% CI 1.172-2.023 per 10-point increase) and cardiac events in patients with heart failure after discharge.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=1,452)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does the GWTG-HF risk score predict long-term all-cause mortality and cardiac events in patients with heart failure after discharge?

P
Population
1,452 patients with heart failure (749 with HFpEF [EF ≥50%] and 703 with HFrEF [EF <50%]) admitted to a single hospital and discharged after treatment in a Japanese population.
I
Intervention
Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) risk score assessment (stratified into low, moderate, and high score groups)
C
Comparator
Lower GWTG-HF risk score groups
O
Outcome
All-cause mortality and cardiac events (including worsening HF and cardiac death) after dischargehard clinical

The GWTG-HF risk score, originally developed to predict in-hospital mortality, is also a significant predictor of long-term all-cause mortality and cardiac events in discharged heart failure patients.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 1.537 (95% CI 1.172-2.023)

Abstract

Background The Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure ( GWTG - HF ) risk score was developed using American Heart Association GWTG - HF program data and predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with acute heart failure (HF). We aimed to clarify the prognostic impacts of the GWTG - HF risk score in patients with HF after discharge. Methods and Results We examined the GWTG - HF score in 1452 patients with HF, who were admitted to our hospital and discharged after treatment, by calculating 7 predetermined variables. We divided all subjects into 3 groups according to the GWTG - HF risk score (low, moderate, and high score groups). The plasma B-type natriuretic peptide level significantly increased with increasing GWTG - HF risk score severity (median values of B-type natriuretic peptide: 167.0 in low, 260.7 in moderate, and 418.2 pg/mL in high score groups). We followed up all subjects after discharge, and there were 347 (23.9%) all-cause deaths and 407 (28.0%) cardiac events in follow-up periods. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated that event rates of all-cause death and cardiovascular events, including worsening HF and cardiac death, significantly increased with increasing GWTG - HF risk score severity in all subjects, and also in 749 patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (ejection fraction ≥50%) and 703 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (ejection fraction <50%) patients. The multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis demonstrated that the GWTG - HF risk score was one of the significant predictors of all-cause mortality and cardiac events (all-cause mortality: hazard ratio, 1.537, 95% confidence interval, 1.172-2.023; cardiac events: hazard ratio, 1.584, 95% confidence interval, 1.344-1.860, per 10-point increase of GWTG - HF score). Conclusions The GWTG - HF risk score is a useful multivariable score model for several years after hospitalization in patients with HF in a Japanese population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suzuki et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Chronic Heart Failure (n=1,452). Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) risk score vs. Low vs moderate vs high score groups was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.537, 95% CI 1.172-2.023). The GWTG-HF risk score significantly predicted all-cause mortality (HR 1.537; 95% CI 1.172-2.023 per 10-point increase) and cardiac events in patients with heart failure after discharge.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12a30eb8b0b51fb9a403bchttps://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.117.008316
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper