PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 20, 2022Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment25 citationsOpen Access

Minding the boundary: social–ecological contexts for fence ecology and management

View Full Paper
WXWenjing XuLHLynn Huntsinger

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Fencing is a globally ubiquitous yet largely underestimated human infrastructure. To date, most fencing‐related research and management has focused on its biophysical outcomes. However, fencing is often part of coupled human and natural systems, and inevitably affects social and ecological dynamics and the links between them. Drawing from three key case studies in the US, China, and South Africa, we delineate five social pathways through which fencing shapes social–ecological dynamics in a landscape. We show that the social functions and physical appearance of fencing conjointly form a positive feedback loop that stimulates the proliferation of fences across entire landscapes, rendering fencing a more impactful feature than expected from its ecological impacts alone. The emerging field of fence ecology and management must embrace the social–ecological complexities of fenced landscapes to minimize unanticipated social consequences.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12a88dea48cb855a354322https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2500
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper