PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 15, 1992New England Journal of Medicine686 citationsOpen Access

Deep-Vein Thrombosis and the Incidence of Subsequent Symptomatic Cancer

View Full Paper
PPPaolo PrandoniALAnthonie W.A. LensingHBHarry R. Büller

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the association between symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis and the risk of subsequent overt cancer.
  • Enrolled 260 patients with symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis and followed 250 over two years.
  • Compared cancer incidence in patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis versus secondary venous thrombosis.
  • Conducted routine examinations for cancer detection at diagnosis and during follow-up.
  • Cancer was found in 5 of 153 patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis (3.3%).
  • During follow-up, 11 of 145 patients with idiopathic thrombosis developed cancer (7.6%), compared to 2 of 105 secondary cases (1.9%; OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0–5.2, P=0.043).
  • Patients with recurrent idiopathic thrombosis had a higher incidence of cancer (17.1%; OR 9.8, 95% CI 1.8–52.2) compared to secondary cases.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In contrast to the established relation between overt cancer and subsequent venous thromboembolism, it is unclear whether symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis is associated with a risk of subsequent overt malignant disease. METHODS: Two hundred sixty consecutive patients with symptomatic, venographically proved deep-vein thrombosis were enrolled in a study, of whom 250 were followed during a two-year period. Among those assessed during follow-up, the incidence of subsequently detected cancer in the 105 patients with secondary venous thrombosis (i.e., thrombosis associated with a well-recognized risk factor other than cancer) was compared with the incidence of cancer in the 145 patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis. RESULTS: Routine examination at the time of diagnosis of the venous thrombosis revealed cancer in 5 of the 153 enrolled patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis (3.3 percent) and in none of the 107 enrolled patients with secondary venous thrombosis. During follow-up, overt cancer developed in 2 of the 105 patients with secondary venous thrombosis (1.9 percent) and in 11 of the 145 patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis (7.6 percent; odds ratio, 2.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 5.2; P = 0.043). Of the 145 patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis, 35 had confirmed recurrent thromboembolism. Overt cancer subsequently developed in 6 of the 35 (17.1 percent). The incidence of cancer in the patients with recurrent idiopathic venous thrombosis was higher than that in the patients with secondary venous thrombosis (P = 0.008; odds ratio, 9.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 52.2) or in the patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis that did not recur (P = 0.024; odds ratio, 4.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 15.3). CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically significant and clinically important association between idiopathic venous thrombosis and the subsequent development of clinically overt cancer, especially among patients in whom venous thromboembolism recurs during follow-up.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Prandoni et al. (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12be895bb7edc7189e3620https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199210153271604
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper