PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 23, 2026The Journal of Technology Transfer0 citationsOpen Access

Structural centrality of artificial intelligence and technology transfer: evidence from pharmaceutical innovation labs

GPGalo PeraltaBSBlanca SánchezRRRaj Ratwani

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence is increasingly reshaping pharmaceutical research and development, yet limited attention has been paid to how firms organise the integration and governance of AI-related capabilities. This study examines how large pharmaceutical companies structure innovation labs as organisational interfaces for mobilising and coordinating AI-driven knowledge and technologies. Building on technology transfer and organisational design theory, we conceptualise the structural centrality of artificial intelligence within innovation labs as a key design variable shaping governance arrangements, collaboration patterns, and appropriability conditions. Drawing on an original dataset of 138 innovation labs established by 24 of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies, we classify labs according to whether artificial intelligence is absent, embedded within broader innovation portfolios, or structurally centralised in dedicated units. Using a configuration-based descriptive approach, we analyse differences in strategic orientation, collaborative models, and activity profiles across these configurations. The findings are consistent with the view that variation in structural centrality is associated with systematically different patterns of capability governance. Labs in which artificial intelligence is embedded appear to rely on diffusion-oriented and partnership-based arrangements, supporting cross-domain experimentation. In contrast, dedicated artificial intelligence labs display characteristics consistent with more internalised and governance-intensive configurations. Moreover, AI-focused infrastructures are highly concentrated among the largest firms, suggesting scale-dependent conditions for orchestrating data-intensive capabilities. By conceptualising innovation labs as differentiated organisational interfaces for AI-related technology transfer, this study extends contingent models of technology transfer into the domain of digital transformation in regulated, science-based industries.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peralta et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12d2a78793652519a67c26https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-026-10347-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure2012 · 1,087 citations
  2. 2Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox2019 · 378 citations
  3. 3Artificial intelligence drives the digital transformation of pharma2023 · 23 citations
  4. 4Data, Competition, and Digital Platforms2024 · 82 citations
  5. 5Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox2021 · 2,392 citations