PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1980American Political Science Review130 citations

The Urban Bureaucracy and the Chicago Political Machine: Who Gets What and the Limits to Political Control

View Full Paper
KMKenneth R. Mladenka

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

It has long been assumed that urban political machines trade services for votes. However, this study of Chicago found no evidence to suggest that the political machine uses vital public services to reward loyal supporters and to punish enemies. With few exceptions, distribution patterns are a function of past decisions, population shifts, technological changes, and reliance upon technical-rational criteria and professional values. The urban bureaucracy is the major actor in the distributional process. Equity in the distribution of resources is accomplished according to formula and is increasingly a by-product of allegiance to professional standards.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kenneth R. Mladenka (1980) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a139673ae549d8bbc3c794ehttps://doi.org/10.2307/1954318
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper