PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1984Journal of Biological Chemistry129 citationsOpen Access

The ATPase mechanism of skeletal and smooth muscle acto-subfragment 1.

View Full Paper
SRSteven S. RosenfeldETEdwin W. Taylor

Key Result

Kinetic analysis of skeletal muscle actin with subfragment 1 revealed a four-state ATPase cycle model, with product release rate constants of 85 s-1 for striated and 3 s-1 for smooth muscle.

Key Points

  • This research aims to characterize the ATPase cycle kinetics of skeletal and smooth muscle acto-subfragment 1 (S-1) with actin.
  • Measured tryptophan fluorescence to evaluate transient and steady-state kinetic parameters.
  • Covalently cross-linked S-1 to actin to define properties of the associated system.
  • Applied a four-state model to fit observed rate constants and determine rate and equilibrium constants.
  • Effective rate constant for product release was 85 s-1 for striated muscle and 3 s-1 for smooth muscle.
  • The rate constants k1 for skeletal or smooth muscle acto-S-1 were 2-3 times smaller than those for S-1 alone.
  • Predicted differences in association and steady-state ATPase activity based on fitted rate constants from transient evidence.

PICO

I
Intervention / Comparator
Skeletal and smooth muscle acto-subfragment 1 vs Subfragment 1 alone
O
Primary Outcome
Transient and steady-state kinetic parameters for the ATPase cycle

Limitations

  • The proposed mechanism does not exclude the possibility of additional ATP or product intermediate states, whose properties cannot be deduced from the kinetic evidence.

Abstract

The transient and steady-state kinetic parameters for the ATPase cycle of the complex of skeletal muscle actin with smooth or skeletal muscle subfragment 1 (S-1) were determined over a wide range of actin concentrations from measurements of protein tryptophan fluorescence, the transient hydrolysis step, and the steady-state rate. The properties of the completely associated system were determined by using S-1 covalently cross-linking to actin. A four-state model was found to provide a good approximation to the kinetic and steady-state behavior: (sequence; see text) where T, D, and Pi refer to ATP, ADP, and inorganic phosphate, respectively. The formation of AM1T and M1T occurs by a rapid equilibrium binding of T followed by a very fast step. Actin is in rapid equilibrium with M1T and M2.DPi, with association constants K2 and K4. The three rate constants k1, k-1, and k5 were obtained by fitting observed rate constants from transient state measurements and VM to the model using values of k3 and k-3 determined for S-1 alone. To fit the data for skeletal or smooth muscle acto-S-1, the calculated rate constant of the hydrolysis step k1 and the equilibrium constant K1 had to be 2-3 times smaller than the corresponding parameters (k3, K3) for S-1. The calculated effective rate constant for product release must be large for striated muscle (85 s-1 at 20 degrees C, low ionic strength) and relatively small for smooth muscle (3 s-1). The difference in the actin-concentration dependence of association and of steady-state ATPase activity was predicted correctly from the rate constants fitted to the transient evidence. While the proposed mechanism does not exclude the possibility of additional ATP or product intermediate states, the properties of such states cannot be deduced from the kinetic evidence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rosenfeld et al. (1984) studied this question. Skeletal and smooth muscle acto-subfragment 1 vs. Subfragment 1 alone was evaluated on Transient and steady-state kinetic parameters for the ATPase cycle. Kinetic analysis of skeletal muscle actin with subfragment 1 revealed a four-state ATPase cycle model, with product release rate constants of 85 s-1 for striated and 3 s-1 for smooth muscle.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13ca003f9a9dbf1d39e3c9https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(20)71298-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper