PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 23, 2019Frontiers in Pharmacology23 citationsOpen Access

Method Validation for Simultaneous Quantification of Olmesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide in Human Plasma Using LC-MS/MS and Its Application Through Bioequivalence Study in Healthy Volunteers

AKArvind KumarSDSurya Prakash DwivediTPTulika Prasad

Key Result

A novel liquid-liquid extraction LC-MS/MS method was successfully developed and demonstrated that the test formulation of olmesartan and hydrochlorothiazide was bioequivalent to the reference product.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Adult, healthy human volunteers under fasting conditions. Key inclusion: age 18-45 years, BMI 18.5-24.9, normal electrocardiogram. Key exclusion: hypersensitivity to Olmesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide, psychosis, smoking, alcoholism, diabetes, or any other diseases compromising major organ systems.
I
Intervention
Test formulation of Olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide in fixed-dose tablet (40 mg/25 mg film-coated tablet) administered orally
C
Comparator
Reference formulation of Olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide (40 mg/25 mg film-coated tablet)
O
Outcome
Simultaneous quantification of Olmesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide in human plasma for bioequivalence evaluationsurrogate

A novel, simple, and cost-effective LC-MS/MS method using liquid-liquid extraction was validated for simultaneous quantification of olmesartan and hydrochlorothiazide in human plasma and successfully applied to a bioequivalence study.

Abstract

A new, simple, sensitive, selective, rapid and high throughput liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method has been developed and validated for simultaneous quantification of Olmesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide in human plasma. Simple liquid–liquid extraction procedure was applied for plasma sample pretreatment using a mixture of diethyl ether and dichloromethane, as an extraction solution. Analytes were separated on Unisol C18 150*4.6 mm, 5 µm column using methanol and 2 mM ammonium acetate pH 5.5 (80:20, v/v) as a mobile phase and detected by electrospray ionization in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The mass transition ion-pairs were followed in negative ion mode as m/z 445.20 → 148.90 for Olmesartan; m/z 451.40 → 154.30 for Olmesartan D6 and m/z 295.80 → 205.10 for Hydrochlorothiazide; m/z 298.90 → 206.30 for Hydrochlorothiazide 13C D2. The method showed excellent linearity (r2 > 0.99) over the concentration range of 5.002–2599.934 ng/ mL for Olmesartan and from 3.005–499.994 ng/ mL for Hydrochlorothiazide. Precision (% CV) and accuracy (% bias) for Olmesartan were found in the range of 3.07–9.02 % and −5.00–0.00 %, respectively. Precision (% CV) and accuracy (% bias) for hydrochlorothiazide were found in the range of 3.32–8.21 % and 1.99–3.80 %, respectively. This as developed novel and high throughput liquid–liquid extraction bioanalytical method has substantial innovative value with the benefits of cost effectiveness, good extraction efficiency, shorter analysis run time, low organic solvent consumption and simpler procedure over the previously reported solid phase extraction method. The application of this method in pharmacokinetic studies was further demonstrated successfully through a bioequivalence study conducted on healthy human subjects, following oral administration of combined formulation of Olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide in fixed-dose tablet.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kumar et al. (2019) studied Healthy volunteers (n=28). Olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide test formulation vs. Reference formulation 40 mg/25 mg was evaluated on Bioequivalence (Cmax and AUC0-∞). A novel liquid-liquid extraction LC-MS/MS method was successfully developed and demonstrated that the test formulation of olmesartan and hydrochlorothiazide was bioequivalent to the reference product.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13ce0a3f9a9dbf1d39e6aehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00810
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper