PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 15, 1993New England Journal of Medicine480 citationsOpen Access

Effects of Vesnarinone on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Heart Failure

View Full Paper
AFArthur M. FeldmanMBMichael R. BristowWPWilliam W. Parmley

Key Result

Six months of therapy with 60 mg of vesnarinone per day reduced the risk of death or worsening heart failure by 50% (95% CI, 20-69%; P=0.003) compared to placebo.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=477)

Blinding

Double-blind

Structured PICO

Does vesnarinone reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure?

P
Population
Patients with symptomatic heart failure and ejection fractions of 30 percent or less, receiving concomitant therapy with digoxin (87%) and an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (90%).
I
Intervention
Vesnarinone 60 mg per day (an initial 120 mg per day arm was stopped early due to increased mortality).
C
Comparator
Matching placebo.
O
Outcome
Composite of death or worsening heart failure during the six-month study period.composite

Vesnarinone 60 mg daily reduced morbidity and mortality and improved quality of life in patients with symptomatic heart failure, though a higher dose was associated with increased mortality.

Main Result

Effect estimate: Risk reduction 50% (95% CI 20-69)

Absolute Event Rate: 10.9% vs 21%

p-value: p=0.003

Limitations

  • A higher dose of vesnarinone (120 mg per day) increased mortality, suggesting a narrow therapeutic range
  • The long-term effects of vesnarinone are unknown
  • Long-term effects of vesnarinone are unknown

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inotropic therapy, other than with digitalis glycosides, has had limited success in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. We investigated whether vesnarinone, a new positive inotropic agent, reduces morbidity and mortality and improves the quality of life of patients with symptomatic heart failure. METHODS: Patients receiving concomitant therapy with digoxin (87 percent) and an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (90 percent) who had ejection fractions of 30 percent or less were randomly assigned to receive double-blinded therapy with 60 mg of vesnarinone per day, 120 mg of vesnarinone per day, or placebo. Afer 253 patients had been enrolled, randomization to the 120-mg vesnarinone group had to be stopped because of a significant increase in early mortality in this group. Thereafter, patients were randomly assigned only to 60 mg of vesnarinone per day (a total of 239 patients) or placebo (a total of 238 patients). RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients in the group receiving 60 mg of vesnarinone than in the group receiving placebo (26 vs. 50 patients; P = 0.003) died or had worsening heart failure during the six-month study period. The reduction in risk was 50 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 20 to 69 percent). Similarly, there was a 62 percent reduction (95 percent confidence interval, 28 to 80 percent) in the risk of dying from any cause among the patients receiving vesnarinone. Furthermore, quality of life improved to a greater extent in the vesnarinone group than in the placebo group over 12 weeks (P = 0.008). The principal side effect associated with vesnarinone was reversible neutropenia, which occurred in 2.5 percent of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Six months of therapy with 60 mg of vesnarinone per day resulted in lower morbidity and mortality and improved the quality of life of patients with congestive heart failure. However, a higher dose of vesnarinone (120 mg per day) increased mortality, suggesting that this drug has a narrow therapeutic range; the long-term effects of vesnarinone are unknown.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Feldman et al. (1993) conducted an RCT in Symptomatic heart failure (n=477). Vesnarinone vs. Placebo was evaluated on Death or worsening heart failure (Risk reduction 50%, 95% CI 20-69, p=0.003). Six months of therapy with 60 mg of vesnarinone per day reduced the risk of death or worsening heart failure by 50% (95% CI, 20-69%; P=0.003) compared to placebo.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13d4ec2ecb6dc54189101ahttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199307153290301
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Quality of Life: Can It and Should It Be Assessed in Patients with Heart Failure?2008 · 58 citations
  2. 2Rate-Dependent Class III Antiarrhythmic Action, Negative Chronotropy, and Positive Inotropy of a Novel Ik Blocking Drug, UK-68,7981990 · 181 citations
  3. 3Diastolic Dysfunction in Congestive Heart Failure1991 · 353 citations
  4. 4Beneficial effects of pimobendan on exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with heart failure. Results of a multicenter trial. The Pimobendan Multicenter Research Group.1992 · 196 citations
  5. 5Usefulness of OPC-8212, a quinolinone derivative, for chronic congestive heart failure in patients with ischemic heart disease or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy1991 · 61 citations