PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 2026npj Biodiversity0 citationsOpen Access

Practitioner perceptions of biodiversity criteria for solar suitability analyses in the United States

DCDaphne CondonMLMichael O. LevinASAdam B. Smith

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine which biodiversity-relevant criteria are essential for solar suitability analyses and assess data availability.
  • Convened a Delphi panel of practitioners with expertise in biodiversity and renewable energy in the US.
  • Identified 16 core and 13 peripheral biodiversity-relevant criteria for solar suitability analyses.
  • Assessed existing data availability and infrastructure for the identified criteria.
  • Practitioners identified 16 core biodiversity-relevant criteria primarily aligned with regulatory frameworks.
  • Open-access data were found available for 14 core criteria across 10 different databases.
  • 10 out of the assessed US-based solar suitability analyses included core biodiversity-relevant criteria.

Abstract

Abstract Acceleration of large-scale solar energy deployment can pose competition for land with biodiversity conservation areas. Solar suitability analyses (SSAs) help identify low-conflict zones for solar development, yet limited work defines which biodiversity-relevant criteria (BRCs) are essential for SSAs or whether supporting data are available. We convened a United States-based Delphi panel of practitioners with expertise in biodiversity and renewable energy to identify BRCs that are essential across SSAs (‘core’) and data- or scale-limited (‘peripheral’). Practitioners identified 16 core and 13 peripheral BRCs. Core criteria primarily aligned with regulatory frameworks, while peripheral BRCs reflected context-dependent ecological attributes lacking consistent and scalable data. Open-access data were available for 14 core criteria across 10 databases. Our assessment of US-based SSAs revealed that 10 included core BRCs. Our findings indicate a need for improved access to fine-scale biodiversity data and coordination with agencies to improve SSAs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Condon et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e7cf0e02ee3982d326a9https://doi.org/10.1038/s44185-026-00133-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper