PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 20260 citationsOpen Access

SecureAgent: A Multi-Agent Large Language Model Framework for Context-Aware Vulnerability Detection and Patch Recommendation

View Full Paper
SNS Nishad

Key Points

  • The research aims to improve vulnerability detection and patch recommendation for software security through a multi-agent framework.
  • Developed SecureAgent framework with specialized agents for various security tasks.
  • Defined system architecture and evaluation plan with focus on context-aware analysis.
  • Utilized public benchmarks for comparison against traditional SAST tools.
  • Framework ties vulnerabilities to specific source locations and risk categories accurately.
  • Introduced a reproducible methodology for AI-assisted security evaluation.
  • Designed for enhancing verification processes over autonomous AI actions.

Abstract

AI coding assistants are increasingly used in software development, but the code they produce requires rigorous security review. Existing static application security testing (SAST) tools often lack the project-level context needed to reason about distributed applications, authentication flows, and cross-file vulnerabilities. This paper presents SecureAgent, a multi-agent LLM framework designed for evidence-grounded vulnerability detection and patch recommendation. SecureAgent separates the review process into coordinated specialized agents: repository indexing, static scanning, dependency analysis, semantic review, data-flow tracing, exploitability validation, patch drafting, and human review. Unlike single-prompt code assistants, SecureAgent requires every reported vulnerability to be tied to specific source locations, a CWE category, an OWASP Top 10 risk category, and a validation status. The framework treats LLM responses as hypotheses, not findings, until they are supported by deterministic evidence. The paper defines the system's architecture, threat model, trust boundaries, inter-agent communication format, evidence schema, context-selection policy, and evaluation plan. While this work presents the design and prototype specification rather than completed benchmark results, it establishes a reproducible methodology for comparing AI-assisted security frameworks against traditional SAST tools, dependency scanners, and single-agent LLM review using public benchmarks (OWASP Benchmark, Juliet) and CVE-linked repositories. The core contribution is an auditable, constraint-driven design that prioritizes verification over autonomous action, aiming to make AI-assisted security review more reliable and transparent.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

S Nishad (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e7cf0e02ee3982d32789https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20359412
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper