PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Constitutional Justice Project: assessment of the impact of decisions of the constitutional court and supreme court of appeal on the transformation of society

View Full Paper
HCHuman Sciences Research Council

Key Points

  • This project aims to assess how decisions from constitutional and supreme courts influence societal transformation, particularly regarding rights.
  • Conducted interviews with stakeholders involved in socio-economic rights cases.
  • Engaged judges, applicants, advocates, and community members affected by court judgments.
  • Employed qualitative methods to analyze feedback and recommendations from project colloquia.
  • Highlighted the need for additional research on civil and political rights to complement existing socio-economic rights assessments.
  • Identified various suggestions from stakeholders for broadening the research scope.
  • Gathered empirical data indicating the transformative potential of court decisions in society.

Abstract

This report deals with the empirical data gathered during the fieldwork phase of the CJP. The fieldwork consists of interviews with a range of stakeholders and role-players involved in socio-economic rights cases, from Judges to applicants to public servants; from Advocates to focus groups with members of communities who may have been affected by the judgments. Below, the report expands on the methodologies used throughout the life of the project, as well as activities and plans for the final phases of the project. As already established, the existing scope of the research is broad for its scheduled implementation period of 18 months. In addition, many suggestions have been made at the project colloquia held in February and November 2014; by interviewees; and by members of the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee of Justice to expand the scope of the research project to include civil and political rights, as well as an analysis of the decisions of the high courts. These possibilities need to be further explored between the research team and the department.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Human Sciences Research Council (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e7cf0e02ee3982d327c3https://doi.org/10.14749/32385549
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper