PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating the national evaluation system in South Africa: what has been achieved in the first 5 years?

View Full Paper
HCHuman Sciences Research Council

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the impact of South Africa's National Evaluation System (NES) on programs and policies.
  • Theory-based approach with international benchmarking
  • National and provincial case studies, including 112 key informant interviews
  • Cost-benefit analysis of evaluated programs
  • 67 national evaluations completed or underway, covering over $10 billion in spending
  • High return on evaluations estimated at R7 to R10 for each rand invested
  • Provinces initiated evaluation plans, but issues of quality and evaluation duration remain

Abstract

South Africa has pioneered national evaluation systems (NESs) along with Canada, Mexico, Colombia, Chile, Uganda and Benin. South Africa's National Evaluation Policy Framework (NEPF) was approved by Cabinet in November 2011. An evaluation of the NES started in September 2016. The purpose of the evaluation was to assess whether the NES had had an impact on the programmes and policies evaluated, the departments involved and other key stakeholders; and to determine how the system needs to be strengthened. The evaluation used a theory-based approach, including international benchmarking, five national and four provincial case studies, 112 key informant interviews, a survey with 86 responses and a cost-benefit analysis of a sample of evaluations. Since 2011, 67 national evaluations have been completed or are underway within the NES, covering over 10 billion of government expenditure. Seven of South Africa's nine provinces have provincial evaluation plans and 68 of 155 national and provincial departments have departmental evaluation plans. Hence, the system has spread widely but there are issues of quality and the time it takes to do evaluations. It was difficult to assess use but from the case studies it did appear that instrumental and process use were widespread. There appears to be a high return on evaluations of between R7 and R10 per rand invested. The NES evaluation recommendations on strengthening the system ranged from legislation to strengthen the mandate, greater resources for the NES, strengthening capacity development, communication and the tracking of use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Human Sciences Research Council (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e81d0e02ee3982d32c97https://doi.org/10.14749/32379855
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1National Evaluation Systems Under Review: Comparing Existing Assessment Tools and Introducing the National Evaluation Capacities Index (INCE)2026
  2. 2Mere compliance or learning: M&E culture in the public service of Benin, Uganda and South Africa2026
  3. 3Grade 6 systemic evaluation: Northern Cape province2026
  4. 4Institutionalizing Evaluation as a Governance Capability: Evidence from Agriculture and Economic Policy in Africa2026
  5. 5Grade 6 Systemic Evaluation: Eastern Cape province2026