PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

A well-perceived, blind image quality assessment algorithm using an enhanced noise feature criterion

YHYi-Pin HsuCHChuan-Yen Hsiao

Key Points

  • This research aims to enhance blind image quality assessment methods by introducing a revised noise feature criterion.
  • Developed an enhanced no-reference BIQA method incorporating revised noise weighting and decision criteria.
  • Evaluated performance on four publicly available databases (LIVE, CSIQ, TID2013, KADID-10k).
  • Conducted comparative analysis with a reference algorithm using Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients.
  • The proposed algorithm resulted in higher Spearman rank order correlation coefficient than the baseline algorithm.
  • It achieved more accurate estimations for 24 distortion-free images in the TID2013 dataset.
  • The algorithm more effectively categorized images into the 'Excellent' quality region compared to the reference algorithm.

Abstract

Abstract Many deep learning-based blind image quality assessment (BIQA) methods achieve high accuracy but rely heavily on complex network architectures and large datasets, which limit their applicability. This study proposes an enhanced perception-based no-reference (NR) BIQA method that incorporates a revised noise feature criterion for immediate and practical use. This approach was motivated by observations that conventional noise feature analysis becomes unstable in images with strong horizontal structures, such as fence-like patterns. To address this limitation, improved noise weighting and decision criteria were introduced. The method was evaluated on four publicly available databases (LIVE, CSIQ, TID2013, and KADID-10k), demonstrating higher or comparable prediction performance relative to the baseline algorithm, as measured by Spearman rank order correlation coefficient (SROCC) and Pearson linear correlation coefficient (PLCC). A detailed comparative analysis of quality estimation performance was conducted between the reference algorithm and the proposed algorithm. The estimated image quality scores were presented side by side, demonstrating that the proposed algorithm achieved more accurate estimations for the 24 perfect and distortion-free images in the TID2013 dataset. The results showed that the proposed algorithm placed all images closer to the ‘Excellent’ quality region according to Matlab help center description, aligning more closely with the expected evaluation goals than the reference algorithm.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hsu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e81d0e02ee3982d32db8https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-54147-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper