PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Responding to men

View Full Paper
HCHuman Sciences Research Council

Key Points

  • This article examines the complex relationships between counsellors and male perpetrators within intervention programmes, focusing on social identifications.
  • Qualitative interviews were conducted with counsellors involved in intervention programmes for male perpetrators.
  • Analysis explored the intersubjective dynamics between counsellors and clients, considering factors such as age, gender, race, and class.
  • Counsellors and clients negotiate their identities, influencing counselling dynamics and potential outcomes.
  • Recognition of social identifications facilitates a more nuanced approach to addressing the needs of male abusers.
  • Understanding over psychic identification can help overcome differences in the counselling encounter.

Abstract

Despite a body of work on male perpetrators experiences of intervention programmes, little is known about the intersubjective aspects of the relationships between counsellors and perpetrators. This article explores the intervention context as a social encounter, in which the identities of both parties are implicated, drawing on qualitative interviews with counsellors. We show how social identifications such as age, gender, race and class intersect to produce different possibilities for counsellors and clients, but also how identification involves more than just social similarity. We suggest that a responsive response to counselling male abusers may mean the recognition of the importance of identification across and through social similarity but it may also mean working through psychic identification to overcome difference in the counselling encounter.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Human Sciences Research Council (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e83b0e02ee3982d32f4ahttps://doi.org/10.14749/32383479
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper