PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 2026Journal of the American Chemical Society2 citations

Discovery of a Robust Ru 1 –O–Ce Single Atom Catalyst for Coke-Free Dry Reforming of Methane

View Full Paper
JSJiaqi SiMHMengtao HuangXZXueling Zhang

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a stable single-atom catalyst for dry reforming of methane while preventing coking.
  • Discovery of a Ru1–O–Ce single-atom catalyst tested over 600 hours at varying conditions.
  • Anchoring Ru1–O–Ce sites on Al2O3 to assess catalytic stability at 750 °C for 2000 hours.
  • Conducting mechanistic studies to examine CH4 and CO2 interactions.
  • Achieved over 600 hours of stability for DRM with Ru1–O–Ce catalyst and a conversion rate of 40–225 L gcat–1 h–1.
  • Converted CH4/CO2 approaching thermodynamic equilibrium at high temperatures with no detectable coking.
  • Demonstrated effective activation of CO2 and resiliency of Ru1–O–Ce sites through the creation of oxygen vacancies.

Abstract

Dry reforming of methane (DRM) represents a key route for CO2 utilization and methane valorization, yet catalyst coking and sintering under harsh conditions limits its large-scale application. Here, we discover a single-atom catalyst featuring Ru1–O–Ce sites that operates stably for DRM over 600 h at 40–225 L gcat–1 h–1 without detectable coking. Further anchoring Ru1–O–Ce sites on commercial particulate Al2O3 enables 2000-h catalytic stability at 750 °C, with CH4/CO2 conversions approaching thermodynamic equilibrium. Mechanistic studies reveal that Ru1–O–Ce sites partially dissociate methane at Ru1, and CHx species react with nearby O atoms to form CHxO intermediates; CO2 is efficiently activated at formed oxygen vacancies to restore Ru1–O–Ce sites. This bifunctional behavior aligns CH4 and CO2 activation, ensuring coke-free DRM progression and opening new avenues for designing stable, effective single-atom catalysts for methane reforming.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Si et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e83b0e02ee3982d32fb9https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6c02336
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Catalysis for the Valorization of Exhaust Carbon: from CO 2 to Chemicals, Materials, and Fuels. Technological Use of CO 22013 · 3,108 citations
  2. 2Facilitating the dry reforming of methane with interfacial synergistic catalysis in an Ir@CeO2−x catalyst2024 · 198 citations
  3. 3Cooperativity and Dynamics Increase the Performance of NiFe Dry Reforming Catalysts2017 · 462 citations
  4. 4Disentangling the activity-selectivity trade-off in catalytic conversion of syngas to light olefins2023 · 258 citations
  5. 5Metastable nickel–oxygen species modulate rate oscillations during dry reforming of methane2024 · 100 citations