PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Moon as an Ontological Threshold. On the Boundary of Immanence and the Forgotten Knowledge of Verticality

View Full Paper
OYOleg V. Yermakov

Key Points

  • This article aims to analyze the ontological role of the Moon by integrating traditional knowledge systems.
  • Expanded ontological analysis of the Moon within the context of Vedic cosmology.
  • Evaluation of 20th-century lunar missions' methodologies, including the Apollo program.
  • Development of a criterion for lunar missions based on epistemic rather than technical considerations.
  • The Moon is characterized as a threshold between physical and etheric realms as known in antiquity.
  • Identified shortcomings in the technical approaches of past lunar missions, demonstrating their ontological incompleteness.
  • Proposed a new framework for lunar missions focusing on epistemic proportionality.

Abstract

This article proposes an expanded ontological analysis of the Moon by reintegrating traditional forms of knowledge—particularly Vedic cosmology—in which the Moon is understood as a threshold space between the temporal physical world and a non-temporal, etheric level of being. It is demonstrated that the liminal nature of the Moon was known to humanity since antiquity but was entirely excluded from the methodological framework of 20th-century lunar missions, including the Apollo program. On this basis, the paper advances the thesis that a purely technical approach to threshold cosmic environments is ontologically incomplete and intrinsically risky. The article culminates in the formulation of a rigorous ontological criterion for admissible lunar missions grounded in epistemic proportionality rather than technological capability alone.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oleg V. Yermakov (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e8d20e02ee3982d3364ehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20359903
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper