PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 2026Global Environment0 citationsOpen Access

From sprinkles to kabchi : Ethnographic insights on planetary health and the pluriverse from Bhutan

View Full Paper
SKShivani KaulSWSonam Choeki WangmoPYPema Yangchen

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate the tensions between global health interventions and local food practices in Bhutan's unique context.
  • Conducted multi-sited and multimodal ethnographic work in Bhutan.
  • Compared the use of micronutrient powders, Sprinkles, with traditional recipes for kabchi.
  • Analyzed local socio-ecological implications of feeding practices.
  • Sprinkles were often refused by infants and mothers, indicating misalignment with local practices.
  • Kabchi promoted interdependent logic aligned with eco-social relations.
  • Calls for reimagining health interventions through multidisciplinary and reparative approaches.

Abstract

Global health practitioners concerned about ecological damage caused by ‘human civilisation’ increasingly promote the concept of planetary health. However, anthropologists and philosophers warn against a universal planetary imaginary that relies on biomedical technologies and overlooks alternatives to colonial plantation practices of feeding humans in the global South. This study followed early nutrition interventions in Bhutan, a ‘pluriversal’ context not directly colonised. Our multi-sited and multimodal ethnographic work contrasts the use of micronutrient powders called Sprinkles, globally promoted for cost-effective sustainability during the First 1000 Days, with recipes for kabchi , a roasted cereal powder fed to infants and land deities. We show how Sprinkles enact a bioeconomic logic of feeding that was often refused by infants and mothers – suggesting misalignment with local socio-ecologies. In contrast, kabchi enacted a tendre l (interdependent) logic embedded in eco-social land relations and clinical guidelines. Framing these frictions within Indigenous and anticolonial feminist science studies, we call for reimagining planetary health interventions – and human growth – through multidisciplinary research, sciences-from-below and reparative action. This article was published open access under a CC BY 4.0 licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kaul et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e8d20e02ee3982d33675https://doi.org/10.3828/whpge.63881453971827
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Interscalar health: From Hawaiian fishpond to planet (and back)2026
  2. 2Rationalising planetary relations: The planetary health diet, quantification and multispecies communities2026
  3. 3Planetary health from below: Multispecies health collectives in the environmental aesthetics of contagion and chemical solutions2026
  4. 4Eating as cultural practice: An indigenous Australian case study2026
  5. 5Reclaiming voices, rethinking change: a decolonial and knowledge-ecological analysis of SBCC nutrition interventions in Senegal2025 · 5 citations