PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1988Heart30 citationsOpen Access

Flecainide compared with a combination of digoxin and disopyramide for acute atrial arrhythmias after cardiopulmonary bypass.

TGT P GavaghanAKA M KoeghRKRaymond P. Kelly

Key Result

Flecainide was as effective as digoxin and disopyramide for restoring sinus rhythm within 12 hours (86% vs 89%) but acted significantly faster (median 80 vs 220 minutes).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=56)

Randomization

randomized

Structured PICO

Does intravenous flecainide improve restoration of sinus rhythm compared to digoxin and disopyramide in adult patients with acute atrial arrhythmias after cardiopulmonary bypass?

P
Population
56 adult patients with acute atrial fibrillation and flutter after cardiac surgery (cardiopulmonary bypass)
I
Intervention
Intravenous flecainide (2 mg/kg bolus over 20 minutes followed by an infusion of 0.2 mg/kg per hour for 12 hours)
C
Comparator
Intravenous digoxin (0.75 mg) followed two hours later by an intravenous bolus of disopyramide (2 mg/kg) and an infusion (0.4 mg/kg per hour) for 10 hours
O
Outcome
Restoration of sinus rhythm within 12 hourssurrogate

Flecainide is as effective as the combination of digoxin and disopyramide for converting post-cardiac surgery atrial arrhythmias, but acts significantly faster and with fewer early relapses.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 86% vs 89%

Abstract

Fifty six adult patients were randomised to treatment with flecainide (group 1, n = 29) or a combination of digoxin and disopyramide (group 2, n = 27) for acute atrial fibrillation and flutter after cardiac surgery. Intravenous flecainide was given as a 2 mg/kg bolus over 20 minutes followed by an infusion (0.2 mg/kg per hour) for 12 hours. Group 2 were given digoxin (0.75 mg) intravenously followed two hours later by an intravenous bolus of disopyramide (2 mg/kg) and an infusion (0.4 mg/kg per hour) for 10 hours. Within 12 hours sinus rhythm was restored in 86% of the group 1 (25 patients) and 89% of the group 2 (24 patients). The median time to reversion was significantly shorter in group 1 (80 minutes, range 30-180 minutes) than group 2 (220 minutes, range 138-523 minutes). None of the patients in group 1 and four of the patients in group 2 had transient relapses into atrial fibrillation during the 12 hours of intravenous treatment. There were five late relapses in group 1 and seven in group 2 during subsequent oral treatment. Two group 1 patients and two group 2 patients showed adverse drug effects. Intractable ventricular arrhythmias occurred after five days of oral treatment in one patient (group 1) who had poor left ventricular function, hepatic impairment, and toxic concentrations of drugs at the time of death. Flecainide was as effective as the combination of digoxin and disopyramide and it acted significantly faster and was associated with fewer relapses. Monitoring of blood concentrations of flecainide is essential in patients with poor left ventricular function and hepatic impairment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gavaghan et al. (1988) conducted an RCT in Acute atrial fibrillation and flutter after cardiac surgery (n=56). Flecainide vs. Digoxin (0.75 mg) followed two hours later by disopyramide (2 mg/kg bolus and 0.4 mg/kg per hour infusion for 10 hours) was evaluated on Restoration of sinus rhythm within 12 hours. Flecainide was as effective as digoxin and disopyramide for restoring sinus rhythm within 12 hours (86% vs 89%) but acted significantly faster (median 80 vs 220 minutes).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a144bb77753e742da59d1b4https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.60.6.497
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper