PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1997Clinical Infectious Diseases191 citationsOpen Access

Suggested Modifications to the Duke Criteria for the Clinical Diagnosis of Native Valve and Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Analysis of 118 Pathologically Proven Cases

View Full Paper
CLCristiane da Cruz LamasSESusannah Eykyn

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We analyzed 118 consecutive cases of pathologically proven infective endocarditis (100 cases of native valve endocarditis NVE and 18 cases of prosthetic valve endocarditis PVE) with use of the Beth Israel criteria, the Duke criteria, and our suggested modifications of the Duke criteria; we found improved diagnostic sensitivity with our modifications. These modifications included the following additional minor criteria: the presence of newly diagnosed clubbing, splenomegaly, splinter hemorrhages, and petechiae; a high erythrocyte sedimentation rate; a high C-reactive protein level; and the presence of central nonfeeding lines, peripheral lines, and microscopic hematuria. Analysis of the pathologically proven cases of NVE showed that 64% were probable by the Beth Israel criteria, 83% were definite by the Duke criteria, and 94% were definite by our modified Duke criteria. For the pathologically proven cases of PVE, 50% were probable by the Beth Israel criteria, 50% were definite by the Duke criteria, and 89% were definite by our modified Duke criteria. All cases of NVE and PVE rejected by the Duke criteria remained rejected by our modifications. Therefore, our modifications improved diagnostic sensitivity while retaining specificity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lamas et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a14616f2ecb6dc54189a3ffhttps://doi.org/10.1086/513765
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper