PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2012Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions95 citationsOpen Access

Rupture of the Device Landing Zone During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

View Full Paper
MPMiralem PašićAUAxel UnbehaunSDStephan Dreysse

Key Result

Iatrogenic rupture of the device landing zone during TAVI occurred in 1% of patients (6 of 618) and carried a 50% overall mortality rate, though survival was 75% when recognized intraprocedurally.

Key Points

  • Evaluate the occurrence, presentation, management strategies, and survival outcomes of iatrogenic device landing zone rupture during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
  • Retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation at a single institution between April 2008 and October 2011 (N=618).
  • Assessed diagnostic timing (intraprocedural vs. postmortem), clinical presentation, and subsequent management strategies.
  • Device landing zone rupture occurred in 1% of patients (6 of 618), with diagnosis made intraprocedurally in 4 patients and postmortem in 2 patients.
  • Clinical presentations included apparent bleeding (n=4), failure of myocardial recovery (n=1), and an asymptomatic state (n=1), leading to surgical intervention in 5 patients and conservative management in 1.
  • Overall mortality was 50% (3 of 6 died), with mortality falling to 25% (1 of 4 died) when the rupture was diagnosed intraprocedurally.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=618)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

What is the incidence, clinical presentation, and outcome of iatrogenic rupture in the device landing zone during TAVI?

P
Population
618 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) between April 2008 and October 2011
I
Intervention
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
O
Outcome
Occurrence, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome of iatrogenic rupture in the device landing zonesafety

Rupture of the device landing zone during TAVI is a rare (1%) but life-threatening complication that requires immediate recognition and surgical management to improve survival.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic damage of different structures of the aortic root, in the region of the so-called "device landing zone," may occur during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). It is mostly considered difficult to treat or even untreatable. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the occurrence, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome of iatrogenic rupture in the device landing zone in a series of 618 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI at our institution between April 2008 and October 2011. The incidence of rupture was 1% (6 patients). The correct diagnosis was established during TAVI procedures in 4 and postmortem in 2 patients. The major sign of the aortic rupture was apparent bleeding in 4 patients and failure of myocardial recovery after valve implantation in 1; it was asymptomatic in 1 patient. The iatrogenic rupture in the region of the device landing zone was treated surgically in 5 patients and only conservatively in the patient without symptoms. When the diagnosis was established correctly during TAVI, only 1 of 4 patients died (25%). The overall mortality rate was 50% (3 of 6 patients died). CONCLUSIONS: Rupture of different structures in the device landing zone during TAVI is a life-threatening complication that can be treated successfully if it is immediately recognized and adequately managed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pašić et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) (n=618). Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) was evaluated on Incidence and outcome of iatrogenic rupture in the device landing zone. Iatrogenic rupture of the device landing zone during TAVI occurred in 1% of patients (6 of 618) and carried a 50% overall mortality rate, though survival was 75% when recognized intraprocedurally.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a14e2f744d936d7a862f4f0https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.111.967315
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper