PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 18, 1997BMJ740 citationsOpen Access

The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke

View Full Paper
AHAllan HackshawMLM R LawNWNicholas Wald

Key Points

  • To determine the risk of lung cancer among lifelong non-smokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke from a smoking spouse.
  • Meta-analysis of 37 published epidemiological studies covering 4,626 lung cancer cases in lifelong non-smokers based on spousal smoking status.
  • Comparison of direct epidemiological risk estimates with linear extrapolation models based on 7 biochemical marker studies of smoke intake.
  • Non-smokers living with a smoker had a 24% excess risk of lung cancer (95% CI: 13% to 36%, P<0.001), with an adjusted excess risk of 26% (95% CI: 7% to 47%) after controlling for bias and dietary confounding.
  • A significant dose-response relation was identified between lung cancer risk and both the daily cigarette quantity smoked by the spouse and total exposure duration.
  • Linear extrapolation of risk from active smokers estimated an excess risk of 19%, consistent with the direct adjusted estimate of 26%.

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To estimate the risk of lung cancer in lifelong non-smokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke. Design: Analysis of 37 published epidemiological studies of the risk of lung cancer (4626 cases) in non-smokers who did and did not live with a smoker. The risk estimate was compared with that from linear extrapolation of the risk in smokers using seven studies of biochemical markers of tobacco smoke intake. Main outcome measure: Relative risk of lung cancer in lifelong non-smokers according to whether the spouse currently smoked or had never smoked. Results: The excess risk of lung cancer was 24% (95% confidence interval 13% to 36%) in non-smokers who lived with a smoker (P<0.001). Adjustment for the effects of bias (positive and negative) and dietary confounding had little overall effect; the adjusted excess risk was 26% (7% to 47%). The dose-response relation of the risk of lung cancer with both the number of cigarettes smoked by the spouse and the duration of exposure was significant. The excess risk derived by linear extrapolation from that in smokers was 19%, similar to the direct estimate of 26%. Conclusion: The epidemiological and biochemical evidence on exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, with the supporting evidence of tobacco specific carcinogens in the blood and urine of non-smokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke, provides compelling confirmation that breathing other people's tobacco smoke is a cause of lung cancer. Key messages A woman who has never smoked has an estimated 24% greater risk of lung cancer if she lives with a smoker Neither bias nor confounding accounted for the association There is a dose-response relation between a non-smoker's risk of lung cancer and the number of cigarettes and years of exposure to the smoker The increased risk was consistent with that expected from extrapolation of the risk in smokers using biochemical markers Tobacco specific carcinogens are found in the blood and urine of non-smokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke All the available evidence confirms that exposure to environmental tobacco smoke causes lung cancer

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hackshaw et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a14fed92f0e848eb39af475https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7114.980
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper