PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2006Journal of American History636 citations

The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission and Exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton

View Full Paper
WRWilliam J. Reese

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how Harvard, Yale, and Princeton's admissions policies transformed definitions of merit throughout the twentieth century.
  • Historical analysis of admissions practices at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton.
  • Examination of the change in admissions demographics post-World War II.
  • Evaluation of influential figures and policies impacting admissions criteria.
  • More public school graduates and underrepresented groups, like Jews and African Americans, were admitted post-WWII.
  • The definition of 'merit' evolved beyond just academic performance to include social diversity.
  • Harvard president James Bryant Conant's advocacy for equal educational opportunity shaped admissions policies.

Abstract

Jerome Karabel's engaging history of undergraduate admissions at the “big three”— Harvard, Yale, and Princeton—persuasively explains how academic leaders at these prestigious universities redefined merit over the course of the twentieth century. Faced with many-sided demands for a more inclusive student body after World War II, they ultimately responded by enrolling more public school graduates, Jews, African Americans, women, and members of other groups that sought admission based on their academic achievement. The old private-school boys, part of the venerable but declining Protestant establishment, hardly recognized their alma mater by the end of the sixties. Privilege had assumed a new form. Understanding how different generations of college presidents, faculty, alumni (who often interviewed applicants), and admission officers defined “merit” is the central, fascinating theme in The Chosen. To help ensure a more fluid social order, Americans generally endorse the concept of “equal educational opportunity,” based on the Jeffersonian ideal that talent inheres in all classes and that schools should reward talent and achievement rather than family background and wealth. Harvard president James Bryant Conant eloquently espoused those views in the 1940s and 1950s. Talent needed cultivation in an advanced technological society, and the recruitment of smart youth into the elite university system would help repel the Communist threat during the Cold War.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

William J. Reese (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15017527e17ac3bc9aeb41https://doi.org/10.2307/4486553
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1From Housing to Admissions Redlining: Race, Wealth and Selective Access at Public Flagships, Post-World War II to Present2025
  2. 2Listening to the Upper Class talk about College Admissions: Complex Tension between Class Awareness and Meritocratic Ideals2025
  3. 3Not Only the Score: A Promoter-Based Merit Negotiation in Elite College Admission Battle2025
  4. 4How college students understand American meritocracy: From initial beliefs to emerging meanings.2026
  5. 5The Shape of the Sieve: Which Components of the Admissions Application Matter Most in Particular Institutional Contexts?2024 · 5 citations