PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 2026Traffic Safety Research0 citationsOpen Access

Personality traits as predictors of driver behaviour: a comprehensive profiling study of Portuguese drivers

JDJoana Félix DouradoSFSara FerreiraAPA Dias Pereira

Key Points

  • This study aims to analyze how personality traits influence driving behavior among Portuguese drivers.
  • Community sample of 747 licensed drivers under 75 surveyed online
  • Used NEO-Five Factor Inventory-20, Impulsivity and Sensation Seeking Scale, and Driver Behaviour Questionnaire (DBQ)
  • Conducted multiple linear regressions and cluster analysis to construct driving behaviour profiles.
  • Neuroticism, agreeableness, extraversion, impulsivity predicted driving infractions and aggressive driving
  • Neuroticism, conscientiousness, and impulsivity predicted non-intentional errors
  • Distracted/forgetful drivers showed a positive relationship to crash involvement.

Abstract

Human factors substantially contribute to road crashes. However, assessing their effects is complex due to the influence of individual characteristics such as personality. Therefore, studies examining the relationship between personality traits and driving behaviour are essential. This study aimed to construct driver behaviour profiles based on these relationships within a large sample of Portuguese drivers. A community sample of 747 licensed drivers, aged under 75 and with at least three years of driving experience, completed an online survey. Instruments included the NEO-Five Factor Inventory-20, the Impulsivity and Sensation Seeking Scale, and the 24-item Driver Behaviour Questionnaire (DBQ). Firstly, multiple linear regressions were conducted considering the three driving behaviour dimensions of the DBQ to support the construction of the profiles. Results indicated that neuroticism, agreeableness, extraversion, impulsivity, and sensation seeking predicted infractions and aggressive driving. Neuroticism, conscientiousness, and impulsivity predicted non-intentional errors, while neuroticism, openness, conscientiousness, and impulsivity were associated with lapses. Even after controlling for age and gender, personality traits remained significant predictors. Secondly, four driver behaviour profiles were constructed using two alternative methodologies: an empirical approach and cluster analysis with k-means. Profiles built using the empirical approach resulted in four groups of drivers characterised by more easily identifiable driving behaviours: prudent, regular, distracted/forgetful, and aggressive drivers. The distracted/forgetful group showed a positive relationship to crash involvement. Overall, the study shows that the complex driver behaviour needs to be carefully grouped.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dourado et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153790b5d9c58d83e8bfabhttps://doi.org/10.55329/chby5534
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Further validation of the driver behaviour questionnaire – confirmatory factor analysis in a Portuguese sample2017 · 5 citations
  2. 2Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction?1990 · 1,925 citations
  3. 3Tri-level study of the causes of traffic accidents: Final report. Volume I: Casual factor tabulations and assessments1979 · 78 citations
  4. 4Effect of Culture on Gender Differences in Risky Driver Behavior through Comparative Analysis of 32 Countries2020 · 43 citations
  5. 5A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Older Adults’ Cognitive Impairments and Effects on Road Safety2024 · 3 citations