PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 2026Journal of Robotic Surgery1 citationsOpen Access

Extended reality and emerging artificial intelligence in orthopedic surgical training: a scoping review of educational outcomes

VMValentina Merino MolinaRMRAFAEL ANDRES BARRERA MEDINAJMJohana Stefania Martinez Mora

Key Points

  • The aim is to survey the use of XR and AI in orthopedic surgical training and assess educational outcomes.
  • Conducted a scoping review using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology
  • Included 54 studies with 3,066 participants published between 2015 and 2025
  • Searched databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect for relevant literature.
  • 83.3% used virtual reality (VR), 31.4% used augmented reality, with few AI applications reported.
  • Improvements were noted in simulation-based technical performance metrics; however, limited data exists on long-term skill retention and clinical outcomes.
  • VR is identified as the most mature technology for surgical education, while AI tools are still developing.

Abstract

Abstract Immersive technologies have gained increasing relevance in orthopedic surgical education; however, the scope, outcomes, and maturity of extended reality (XR) and artificial intelligence (AI) applications remain heterogeneous. To map the educational applications, learner populations, outcome measures, and research gaps related to the use of XR and emerging AI tools in orthopedic surgical training. A scoping review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect were searched for English and Spanish studies published between 2015 and 2025. Fifty-four studies involving 3,066 participants were included. Virtual reality (VR) was the predominant modality (83.3%), followed by augmented reality (31.4%), while AI-based applications were infrequently reported. XR-based training was most commonly evaluated in trauma surgery, arthroscopy, and arthroplasty, primarily among medical students and residents. Most studies reported improvements in simulation-based technical performance metrics, whereas evidence on clinical outcomes, long-term skill retention, and cost-effectiveness was limited. XR—particularly VR—represents the most mature immersive technology in orthopedic surgical education. AI applications remain emergent and primarily supportive. Future research should prioritize standardized outcome measures, multicenter designs, and evaluation of long-term educational and clinical impact.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Molina et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1538ebb5d9c58d83e8ca54https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-03230-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews2016 · 26,167 citations
  2. 2Assessing the Impact of Augmented Reality on Surgical Skills Training for Medical Students: A Systematic Review2024 · 5 citations
  3. 3A novel augmented reality-based simulator for enhancing orthopedic surgical training2024 · 18 citations
  4. 4The Effect of Triangulation Simulator Training on Arthroscopy Skills: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial2020 · 16 citations
  5. 5Gamification and Serious Games in Orthopedic Education: A Systematic Review2024 · 8 citations