PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 2026Infrastructures0 citationsOpen Access

Dam-Axis Siting with Improved Adaptive Variable Neighborhood Search Algorithm

View Full Paper
XFXianlin FengRHRui HuangLXLin Xu

Key Points

  • This research aims to improve dam-axis siting in pumped-storage hydropower by optimizing cut-fill balance and construction costs under complex terrains.
  • Implemented an Improved Adaptive Variable Neighborhood Search (IAVNS) algorithm incorporating high-resolution digital elevation model data.
  • Conducted experiments on the Qiannan pumped-storage project with comparisons to existing methods, including a benchmark of 30 runs and a separate analysis of 20 runs.
  • IAVNS achieved a mean cut-fill ratio of 1.31, slightly above the earthwork-balance reference interval.
  • IAVNS improved solution quality by 22.8% compared to Genetic Algorithm and by 16.5% compared to classical Variable Neighborhood Search, with reduced convergence time by 49.5% and 27.4%, respectively.
  • The framework's performance gains were primarily attributed to tailored search mechanisms for dam-axis siting.

Abstract

This study investigates upper-reservoir dam-axis siting in pumped-storage hydropower projects, where cut–fill balance and construction cost are critical under complex terrain conditions. Existing approaches still rely heavily on manual interpretation or static GIS-based analysis and therefore do not adequately optimize dam-axis geometry or earthwork balance. To address this limitation, we propose an Improved Adaptive Variable Neighborhood Search (IAVNS) algorithm that integrates high-resolution digital elevation model (DEM) data within a two-layer adaptive framework. The inner layer performs staged planar and elevation adjustments through adaptive neighborhood operators, whereas the outer layer conducts fitness-guided subregion migration to strengthen global exploration. Experiments on the Qiannan pumped-storage project show that IAVNS obtains layouts with improved cut–fill balance. In the 30-run benchmark comparison, IAVNS achieved a mean CFR of 1.31, which is close to, although slightly above, the upper bound of the adopted earthwork-balance reference interval. In the separate 20-run case-study analysis, the average storage-volume deviation was 0.13%, with run-level deviations ranging from −1.39% to 1.16%. In benchmark comparisons, IAVNS improves solution quality by 22.8% relative to the Genetic Algorithm (GA) and by 16.5% relative to classical Variable Neighborhood Search (VNS), while reducing convergence time by 49.5% and 27.4%, respectively. Sensitivity analysis further suggests that the framework remains locally robust under practically reasonable parameter perturbations, and the module-level ablation study indicates that the observed performance gains arise mainly from the problem-tailored search mechanisms for dam-axis siting rather than from a generic combination of metaheuristic components. Taken together, the case-study results, repeated-run comparison, sensitivity analysis, and ablation study support the use of IAVNS as a geometry-oriented decision-support framework for preliminary dam-axis design in terrain-sensitive hydraulic engineering applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Feng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153a2eb5d9c58d83e8cec0https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11060182
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper