PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 20260 citationsOpen Access

SENSE-CORE-DRIVER: A Governance Architecture for Enterprise AI

View Full Paper
RSRAKTIM SINGH

Key Points

  • This research aims to address the complexities of implementing AI in enterprises by proposing a structured governance framework.
  • Introduced the SENSE-CORE-DRIVER governance framework for enterprise AI systems.
  • Identified key concepts such as representation integrity and runtime legitimacy.
  • Analyzed structural tensions impacting enterprise AI governance.
  • Emphasized that failures in enterprise AI often stem from weak representation infrastructure and unclear authority boundaries.
  • Highlighted the importance of governed execution and oversight mechanisms to validate AI actions.
  • Proposed practical guidelines for scalability and accountability in enterprise AI systems.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving from isolated prediction and recommendation systems into institutional infrastructure that increasingly influences enterprise workflows, operational decisions, governance processes, software engineering, cybersecurity operations, and business execution. Yet many organizations continue to approach AI primarily as a model-selection problem rather than a representation, governance, and institutional-design challenge. This paper introduces SENSE-CORE-DRIVER as a governance architecture for enterprise AI systems. The framework argues that AI systems do not operate directly on reality, but on machine-legible representations of reality. SENSE represents the legibility layer where signals, entities, states, and evolution transform fragmented institutional reality into structured machine-readable understanding. CORE represents the cognition layer where models, reasoning systems, planning engines, orchestration logic, and optimization mechanisms interpret that reality. DRIVER represents the legitimacy and execution layer where delegation, representation, identity, verification, execution, and recourse determine whether AI-driven action is authorized, accountable, and correctable. The paper argues that many enterprise AI failures emerge not merely from weak models, but from weak representation infrastructure, unclear authority boundaries, fragmented context, insufficient runtime governance, and inadequate recourse mechanisms. It introduces key concepts including representation integrity, governed execution, runtime legitimacy, autonomy allocation, and three structural tensions in enterprise AI governance: the representation-legitimacy tension, the human-oversight tension, and the simulation-reality tension. Positioned at the intersection of enterprise architecture, AI governance, institutional systems, and machine-legible reality, SENSE-CORE-DRIVER provides a practical conceptual framework for CIOs, CTOs, enterprise architects, governance leaders, researchers, and policymakers seeking to design scalable, trustworthy, and operationally legitimate enterprise AI systems. Author: Raktim SinghWebsite: https://www.raktimsingh.comORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6207-602XGitHub Repository: https://github.com/raktims2210-dev/representation-economyFigshare DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32393949

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

RAKTIM SINGH (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153a2eb5d9c58d83e8cf70https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20368909
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper