PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 2026Journal of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines0 citations

Ordering of Iron Phthalocyanines on Ni(111) via a graphene buffer layer

View Full Paper
APAndrea PiconeMCMichele CapraABA. Brambilla

Key Points

  • This investigation aims to compare the properties of iron(II) phthalocyanine layers on different substrates to understand the effects of graphene.
  • Molecular layers of iron(II) phthalocyanine were deposited on Ni(111) and graphene-covered Ni(111) under ultra-high-vacuum conditions.
  • Characterization involved Auger electron spectroscopy, low-energy electron diffraction, and scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy.
  • Graphene was synthesized using chemical vapor deposition to create a buffer layer.
  • Auger electron spectroscopy showed a higher degree of molecular order for FePc on graphene/Ni(111).
  • Scanning tunneling microscopy revealed that graphene enhances compact molecular layer formation while Ni(111) resulted in disorder.
  • In both substrate systems, key molecular electronic features were preserved despite differing growth modes.

Abstract

Molecular spintronics exploits the spin-dependent properties emerging at hybrid interfaces between magnetic substrates and molecular layers, offering promising routes toward novel spin-based devices. In this work, we present a comparative investigation of the structural, morphological, and electronic properties of iron(II) phthalocyanine (FePc) monolayers grown on bare Ni(111) and on graphenecovered Ni(111) substrates. High-quality graphene was prepared by chemical vapor deposition, and FePc films were deposited under ultra-high-vacuum conditions. The systems were characterized by Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), low-energy electron diffraction (LEED), and scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy (STM/STS). AES analysis reveals subtle but significant differences in the carbon KVV line shape, indicating a higher degree of molecular order when FePc is deposited on graphene/Ni(111). STM measurements corroborate this finding, showing that graphene promotes the formation of compact, homogeneous molecular layers with locally ordered domains, whereas FePc deposited directly on Ni(111) exhibits a strongly disordered morphology, likely related to a different adsorption geometry and stronger molecule–substrate interactions. STS measurements demonstrate that, despite the distinct growth modes, the main molecular electronic features are preserved in both systems. Overall, our results highlight the key role of graphene as an effective buffer layer, capable of modulating molecule–substrate interactions, thereby providing a versatile platform for future studies of electronic and magnetic coupling in molecular spintronic systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Picone et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153a88b5d9c58d83e8d180https://doi.org/10.1142/s1088424626500252
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper