PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 2026Aerospace0 citationsOpen Access

Introducing a Safety Assessment to Support the Safe and Efficient Integration of Launch and Re-Entry Operations in Europe

View Full Paper
LLLorenz LosenskyTRTobias RabusNFNicolas Fota

Key Points

  • The central aim is to evaluate the safety of integrating launch and re-entry operations into the European airspace using new tools and methodologies.
  • Introduced a new function within the European Network Manager Operations Centre (NMOC).
  • Developed the Network Real-time Mission Monitoring (N-RMM) tool and Debris Response Areas (DRAs).
  • Utilized the Expanded Safety Reference Material (E-SRM) methodology to create specialized Accident Incident Models (AIMs).
  • The developed AIMs for mid-air collisions with space debris showed efficiency in safety barriers.
  • Safety criteria derived are compatible with targeted safety thresholds under specified assumptions.
  • A potential reduction in segregated airspace volume and duration is expected for future operational benefits.

Abstract

The expected rise in space operations challenges the European Air Traffic Management (ATM), as traditional static airspace segregation causes operational inefficiencies. To mitigate this, a new function within the European Network Manager Operations Centre (NMOC), supported by the novel Network Real-time Mission Monitoring (N-RMM) tool, and complemented by ad hoc Debris Response Areas (DRAs), are being developed. This paper introduces the safety assessment of this approach using the Expanded Safety Reference Material (E-SRM) methodology. By developing specialised Accident Incident Models (AIMs) for mid-air collisions with space debris, we quantify safety barrier efficiencies and define a Risk Classification Scheme (RCS). The results indicate that by developing dedicated AIMs for the proposed dynamic airspace-management concept, the derived safety criteria, under the stated assumptions, are compatible with the targeted safety thresholds. The potential reduction in segregated airspace volume and duration remains an expected operational benefit to be quantified in subsequent validation work.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Losensky et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153a88b5d9c58d83e8d1d7https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13060493
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper