PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 2026Techniques in ColoproctologyOpen Access

Comparative study between partial and complete lateral anal sphincterotomy in treatment of chronic anal fissure and its effect on fecal incontinence

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AEAhmed Maher Abd ElmonimAAAhmed Eid AzizMFM. H. Fahmy

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Comparative study assesses fecal continence outcomes in patients with anal fissures, suggesting benefits of partial sphincterotomy.

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the effects of partial and complete lateral anal sphincterotomy on fecal continence and pain in patients with chronic anal fissure.
  • Comparative, prospective, observational study with 40 adults
  • Patients divided into two groups: full-length versus partial sphincterotomy
  • Follow-up visits conducted over 1 month to assess recovery and complications.
  • Postoperative pain was significantly higher in complete sphincterotomy (70%) compared to partial (20%)
  • Significantly more bleeding occurred in complete sphincterotomy group (55%) than partial (25%)
  • Suggests partial sphincterotomy is preferable for patients at risk of fecal incontinence.

Cite This Study

Elmonim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153b00b5d9c58d83e8d3c3https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-026-03343-3
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share