PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 20260 citationsOpen Access

P61: Spectral Signature of CCEGA Black Stars — A Mass-Dependent Frequency Cutoff in GW Echo Spectra

View Full Paper
MSMarc López Sánchez

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze the Regge-Wheeler potential of CCEGA black stars and determine a mass-dependent spectral cutoff.
  • Analyzed the Regge-Wheeler potential structure of CCEGA black stars.
  • Identified mass-dependent spectral cutoff, f_cut(M), using gravitational wave echo spectra.
  • Measured the effect of merger waveforms on echo amplitudes.
  • Identified a frequency cutoff ranging from 2,200–8,000 Hz, decreasing with mass.
  • Near critical mass of 14.75 M☉, the cutoff approaches zero, leading to GW transparency.
  • The Einstein Telescope can measure f_cut(M) for black star mergers within ~200 Mpc distance.

Abstract

We analyze the Regge-Wheeler potential structure of CCEGA black stars and identify a mass-dependent spectral cutoff fcut (M) ≈ 2, 200–8, 000 Hz. The potential cavity is too narrow to support discrete QNM resonances. Instead, the interior barrier produces a frequency-dependent reflection coefficient: Rₑff = 1 for f < fcut (M), falling rapidly above it. The cutoff decreases monotonically with mass, acting as a gravitational wave mass spectrometer — measuring the echo rolloff frequency determines the black star mass independently of the merger waveform. Near Mcrit = 14. 75 M☉, fcut → 0 and the object becomes GW-transparent, producing a continuous transition in echo amplitude at the phase boundary. Einstein Telescope can measure fcut (M) for mergers within ~200 Mpc.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marc López Sánchez (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153bdfb5d9c58d83e8d4b7https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20362520
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1P61: Spectral Signature of CCEGA Black Stars — A Mass-Dependent Frequency Cutoff in GW Echo Spectra2026
  2. 2P59: CCEGA Black Stars as Perfect Gravitational Wave Reflectors — Evanescent Interior and Frequency Cutoff2026
  3. 3P59: CCEGA Black Stars as Perfect Gravitational Wave Reflectors — Evanescent Interior and Frequency Cutoff2026
  4. 4P65: Tidal Deformability of CCEGA Black Stars — Λ ≠ 0 as a Surface Signature2026
  5. 5P77 Gravitational Wave Echo Time as a Function of Black Star Mass in CCEGA2026