Endocardial electrical impedance measurement accurately identified infarct scar regions (AUC 0.96; 95% CI 0.92-1.00) and was not affected by right ventricular pacing.
Does endocardial electrical impedance measurement accurately identify infarct scar independent of cardiac activation sequence in a porcine model of myocardial infarction?
Endocardial electrical impedance accurately identifies infarct scar and remains stable despite changes in cardiac activation sequence, offering a potential advantage over traditional voltage mapping.
Effect estimate: AUC 0.96 (95% CI 0.92-1.00)
BACKGROUND: Measurement of myocardial electrical impedance can allow recognition of infarct scar and is theoretically not influenced by changes in cardiac activation sequence, but this is not known. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of endocardial electrical impedance measurements to recognize areas of infarct scar and to assess the stability of the impedance data under changes in cardiac activation sequence. METHODS: One-month-old myocardial infarction confirmed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was induced in 5 pigs submitted to coronary artery catheter balloon occlusion. Electroanatomic data and local electrical impedance (magnitude, phase angle, and amplitude of the systolic-diastolic impedance curve) were recorded at multiple endocardial sites in sinus rhythm and during right ventricular pacing. By merging the cardiac magnetic resonance and electroanatomic data, we classified each impedance measurement site either as healthy (bipolar amplitude ≥1.5 mV and maximum pixel intensity <40%) or scar (bipolar amplitude <1.5 mV and maximum pixel intensity ≥40%). RESULTS: A total of 137 endocardial sites were studied. Compared to healthy tissue, areas of infarct scar showed 37.4% reduction in impedance magnitude (P < .001) and 21.5% decrease in phase angle (P < .001). The best predictive ability to detect infarct scar was achieved by the combination of the 4 impedance parameters (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.96; 95% confidence interval 0.92-1.00). In contrast to voltage mapping, right ventricular pacing did not significantly modify the impedance data. CONCLUSION: Endocardial catheter measurement of electrical impedance can identify infarct scar regions, and in contrast to voltage mapping, the impedance data are not affected by changes in cardiac activation sequence.
Amorós-Figueras et al. (2017) studied Myocardial infarction (n=5). Endocardial electrical impedance measurement vs. Healthy tissue was evaluated on Predictive ability to detect infarct scar using a combination of 4 impedance parameters (AUC 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-1.00). Endocardial electrical impedance measurement accurately identified infarct scar regions (AUC 0.96; 95% CI 0.92-1.00) and was not affected by right ventricular pacing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: