PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1976Technometrics145 citations

A Comparison of Four Procedures for Multiple Comparisons among Means (Pairwise Contrasts) for Arbitrary Sample Sizes

View Full Paper
HUHans Ury

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

For the situation in which the contrasts of interest are limited to the pairwise comparisons among the means of K samples of equal or unequal sizes, four normal univariate single-stage multiple comparison procedures are compared for significance levels not exceeding 0.05: Scheffe's S-method, Dunn's (1, 2] and sidak's 17 improved version of the Bonferroni method, Hochberg's GT2 procedure 8 utilizing the maximum modulus, and Spjovoll and Stoline's T′-method 19. Rules are given for determining if any method is uniformly preferable (best for all contrasts). Nonuniform preference rules are also proposed and applied to some examples. Auxiliary tables are provided for selecting a method for significance levels 0.01 and 0.05 for several values of v, the number of degrees of freedom of an independent variance estimate, and K. It is shown that the T′-method is uniformly preferable when the sample sizes are “nearly” equal, while one of the other methods will be uniformly preferable when all sample sizes are “s...

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hans Ury (1976) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1540375347fbb1739f79f0https://doi.org/10.2307/1267921
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper