PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1998AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology55 citations

Left atrial systolic and diastolic function accompanying chronic rapid pacing-induced atrial failure

View Full Paper
BHBrian D. HoitYSYanfu ShaoMGMarjorie Gabel

Key Result

Long-term rapid atrial pacing in dogs reduced left atrial ejection fraction (2.2 vs 13.0, P<0.05) and increased atrial stiffness, while preserving left ventricular function.

Key Points

  • To test whether long-term rapid atrial pacing induces isolated left atrial systolic and diastolic dysfunction without altering left ventricular performance.
  • Eight dogs underwent rapid atrial pacing at 400 beats/min for 6 weeks, compared against six sham-operated control dogs.
  • Left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) dimensions and hemodynamics were assessed using sonomicrometers, micromanometers, and transesophageal echocardiography at matched heart rates and LA pressure of 10 mmHg.
  • Rapidly paced dogs had significantly reduced LA ejection fraction (2.2 ± 1.4 vs. 13.0 ± 4.0, P < 0.05), systolic ejection rate (0.3 ± 0.1 vs. 2.8 ± 1.2 vol/s, P < 0.05), and reservoir fraction (0.07 ± 0.04 vs. 0.35 ± 0.06, P < 0.05).
  • LA diastolic chamber stiffness constant increased following rapid pacing (5.7 ± 2.3 vs. 3.4 ± 0.6, P < 0.05), whereas LV systolic performance and relaxation time constants remained unaltered between groups.

PICO

P
Population
Atrial failure (n=14)
I
Intervention / Comparator
Rapid atrial pacing vs Sham-operated controls (400 beats/min)
O
Primary Outcome
Left atrial ejection fraction, p=<0.05

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 2.2% vs 13%

p-value: p=<0.05

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the hypothesis that long-term, rapid atrial pacing produces a model of atrial systolic and diastolic dysfunction but does not alter ventricular function. Eight dogs were atrially paced at 400 beats/min (3:1-5:1 ventricular response) for 6 wk and subsequently instrumented with left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) sonomicrometers and micromanometers. Data were compared with those from six sham-operated controls at matched heart rates and mean LA pressures of 10 mmHg. Dogs with rapid pacing had slightly greater LA volume (10.3 +/- 4.0 vs. 7.9 +/- 4.4 ml) and reduced ejection fraction (2.2 +/- 1.4 vs. 13.0 +/- 4.0, P < 0.05), systolic ejection rate (0.3 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.8 +/- 1.2 vol/s, P < 0.05), and reservoir fraction (0.07 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.35 +/- 0.06, P < 0.05) compared with controls. LA diastolic chamber stiffness was greater after rapid atrial pacing than before (stiffness constant kc, 5.7 +/- 2.3 vs. 3.4 +/- 0.6, P < 0.05), and the ratio of transesophageal echo-determined pulmonary venous systolic to diastolic integrated flow (a measure of relative reservoir to conduit function of the LA) was less in rapidly paced dogs compared with control dogs (0.41 +/- 0.19 vs. 0.68 +/- 0.23, P < 0.05). In contrast, rapid atrial pacing did not influence LV systolic performance or lusitropy, because the LV pressure time derivative and the time constant of LV relaxation were similar in both groups. In this model of isolated atrial myopathy, increased atrial stiffness and enhanced conduit function compensate for impaired atrial booster pump and reservoir functions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hoit et al. (1998) studied Atrial failure (n=14). Rapid atrial pacing vs. Sham-operated controls was evaluated on Left atrial ejection fraction (p=<0.05). Long-term rapid atrial pacing in dogs reduced left atrial ejection fraction (2.2 vs 13.0, P<0.05) and increased atrial stiffness, while preserving left ventricular function.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1552bc79ff98d0de4e7178https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1998.275.1.h183
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper