PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 30, 2015European Heart Journal122 citationsOpen Access

Adenosine triphosphate-guided pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: the UNmasking Dormant Electrical Reconduction by Adenosine TriPhosphate (UNDER-ATP) trial

View Full Paper
AKAtsushi KoboriSSSatoshi ShizutaKIKoichi Inoue

Key Result

ATP-guided pulmonary vein isolation did not significantly improve 1-year freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias compared with conventional PVI (68.7% vs 67.1%; adjusted HR 0.89; P=0.25).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=2,113)

Structured PICO

Does ATP-guided PVI reduce recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with paroxysmal, persistent, or long-lasting AF compared to conventional PVI?

P
Population
2113 patients with paroxysmal, persistent, or long-lasting atrial fibrillation
I
Intervention
Adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using 0.4 mg/kg body weight of ATP to provoke dormant PV conduction, followed by additional radiofrequency energy applications to eliminate dormant conduction
C
Comparator
Conventional pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)
O
Outcome
Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting for >30 s or those requiring repeat ablation, hospital admission, or usage of Vaughan Williams class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year with the blanking period of 90 days post ablationcomposite

ATP-guided PVI does not significantly reduce the 1-year incidence of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias compared with conventional PVI in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Main Result

Effect estimate: adjusted HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.74-1.09)

Absolute Event Rate: 68.7% vs 67.1%

p-value: p=0.25

Abstract

AIMS: Most of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) are due to reconnection of PVs. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether elimination of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-induced dormant PV conduction by additional energy applications during the first ablation procedure could reduce the incidence of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned 2113 patients with paroxysmal, persistent, or long-lasting AF to either ATP-guided PVI (1112 patients) or conventional PVI (1001 patients). The primary endpoint was recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting for >30 s or those requiring repeat ablation, hospital admission, or usage of Vaughan Williams class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year with the blanking period of 90 days post ablation. Among patients assigned to ATP-guided PVI, 0.4 mg/kg body weight of ATP provoked dormant PV conduction in 307 patients (27.6%). Additional radiofrequency energy applications successfully eliminated dormant conduction in 302 patients (98.4%). At 1 year, 68.7% of patients in the ATP-guided PVI group and 67.1% of patients in the conventional PVI group were free from the primary endpoint, with no significant difference (adjusted hazard ratio HR 0.89; 95% confidence interval CI 0.74-1.09; P = 0.25). The results were consistent across all the prespecified subgroups. Also, there was no significant difference in the 1-year event-free rates from repeat ablation for any atrial tachyarrhythmia between the groups (adjusted HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.65-1.08; P = 0.16). CONCLUSION: In the catheter ablation for AF, we found no significant reduction in the 1-year incidence of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias by ATP-guided PVI compared with conventional PVI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kobori et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (n=2,113). ATP-guided pulmonary vein isolation vs. Conventional pulmonary vein isolation was evaluated on Freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting for >30 s or those requiring repeat ablation, hospital admission, or usage of Vaughan Williams class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year (adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.74-1.09, p=0.25). ATP-guided pulmonary vein isolation did not significantly improve 1-year freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias compared with conventional PVI (68.7% vs 67.1%; adjusted HR 0.89; P=0.25).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a155b8cd73ae7522a4e2ad9https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv457
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Repeated Provocation of Time- and ATP-Induced Early Pulmonary Vein Reconnections After Pulmonary Vein Isolation2011 · 75 citations
  2. 2ATP‐Induced Dormant Pulmonary Veins Originating from the Carina Region After Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation of Atrial Fibrillation2009 · 56 citations
  3. 3Reduction of AF Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Isolation by Eliminating ATP‐Induced Transient Venous Re‐Conduction2007 · 147 citations
  4. 4Clinical Implications of Reconnection Between the Left Atrium and Isolated Pulmonary Veins Provoked by Adenosine Triphosphate after Extensive Encircling Pulmonary Vein Isolation2007 · 162 citations
  5. 5Adenosine restores atrio-venous conduction after apparently successful ostial isolation of the pulmonary veins2004 · 99 citations