PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2010Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging20 citationsOpen Access

Quantification of 3D regional myocardial wall thickening from gated magnetic resonance images

View Full Paper
MPMithun PrasadARAmit RameshPKPaul Kavanagh

Key Result

3D quantitative regional thickening and wall motion measures obtained from cardiac MRI correlated strongly with expert clinical visual scoring (r=-0.79 for global wall thickening).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=53)

Structured PICO

P
Population
53 consecutive subjects with short-axis slices and mid-ventricular 2-chamber/4-chamber views on cardiac MRI
I
Intervention
3D quantitative measures of regional myocardial wall motion and thickening using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
C
Comparator
Standard visual scoring assessment (6-point visual scoring of wall motion and wall thickening; 0 = normal; 5 = greatest abnormality) assigned by imaging cardiologists
O
Outcome
Correlation between 3D thickening/wall motion and expert visual scoressurrogate

3D quantitative regional thickening and wall motion measures obtained from MRI correlate strongly with expert clinical scoring, offering a reliable quantitative alternative to visual assessment.

Main Result

Effect estimate: r = -0.79

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop 3D quantitative measures of regional myocardial wall motion and thickening using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to validate them by comparison to standard visual scoring assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 53 consecutive subjects with short-axis slices and mid-ventricular 2-chamber/4-chamber views were analyzed. After correction for breath-hold-related misregistration, 3D myocardial boundaries were fitted to images and edited by an imaging cardiologist. Myocardial thickness was quantified at end-diastole and end-systole by computing the 3D distances using Laplace's equation. 3D thickening was represented using the standard 17-segment polar coordinates. 3D thickening was compared with 3D wall motion and with expert visual scores (6-point visual scoring of wall motion and wall thickening; 0 = normal; 5 = greatest abnormality) assigned by imaging cardiologists. RESULTS: Correlation between ejection fraction and thickening measurements was (r = 0.84; P < 0.001) compared to correlation between ejection fraction and motion measurements (r = 0.86; P < 0.001). Good negative correlation between summed visual scores and global wall thickening and motion measurements were also obtained (r(thick) = -0.79; r(motion) = -0.74). Additionally, overall good correlation between individual segmental visual scores with thickening/wall motion (r(thick) = -0.69; r(motion) = -0.65) was observed (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: 3D quantitative regional thickening and wall motion measures obtained from MRI correlate strongly with expert clinical scoring.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Prasad et al. (2010) reported an observational. 3D quantitative measures of regional myocardial wall motion and thickening using cardiac MRI vs. Standard visual scoring assessment was evaluated on Correlation between 3D thickening/wall motion and expert visual scores (r = -0.79, p=<0.0001). 3D quantitative regional thickening and wall motion measures obtained from cardiac MRI correlated strongly with expert clinical visual scoring (r=-0.79 for global wall thickening).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15625479ff98d0de4e8cc9https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22033
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper