PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2012Journal of Investigative Surgery24 citations

Dabigatran versus Warfarin after Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement in the Swine Model

View Full Paper
JSJohn SchomburgEMEduardo MedinaMLMatthew T. Lahti

Key Result

Dabigatran significantly improved survival compared to warfarin and no anticoagulation after mechanical mitral valve replacement in a swine model (average survival 50.3 vs 15.6 and 18.7 days; p=0.017).

Structured PICO

Does dabigatran improve survival compared to warfarin after mechanical mitral valve replacement in a swine model?

P
Population
19 swine undergoing mitral valve replacement with a regulatory approved, 27 mm mechanical valve
I
Intervention
Dabigatran (20 mg/kg twice a day [BID])
C
Comparator
Two control groups: no anticoagulation (n=3) and warfarin (5 mg once a day [QD], adjusted to maintain INR 2.0 to 2.5) (n=5)
O
Outcome
Animal mortalityhard clinical

In a swine model of mechanical mitral valve replacement, dabigatran provided a significant mortality benefit and fewer bleeding complications compared to warfarin, though valve thrombus occurred in all groups.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 60% vs 100%

p-value: p=0.017

Limitations

  • Conclusions regarding the rate of thrombus formation are outside the scope of this study and merit further investigation.
  • Conclusions regarding the rate of thrombus formation are outside the scope of this study and merit further investigation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mechanical heart valve replacement is an absolute indication for anticoagulation. We report our experience comparing dabigatran to warfarin as thromboembolic prophylaxis after mechanical mitral valve replacement in the swine model. METHODS: Nineteen swine underwent mitral valve replacement with a regulatory approved, 27 mm mechanical valve. Two control groups consisted of three animals receiving no anticoagulation and five animals receiving warfarin (5 mg once a day QD, adjusted to maintain international normalized ratio INR from 2.0 to 2.5). The experimental group consisted of 11 animals receiving dabigatran (20 mg/kg twice a day BID). The study period was 90 days. The primary outcome was animal mortality; secondary outcomes included presence of thrombus and bleeding complications. RESULTS: The experimental group had four full-term survivors (40.0%); there were no full-term survivors in either control group. The average length of survival was 50.3 days in the experimental group compared with 18.7 and 15.6 days for the no anticoagulation and warfarin groups, respectively (p = .017). Valve thrombus was observed in all study groups. Hemorrhagic complications were present in 40% of the warfarin group and 27% of the dabigatran group. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant mortality benefit to the use of dabigatran as thromboembolic prophylaxis when compared with warfarin in the setting of mechanical heart valve replacement in the swine model. There was also a decreased incidence of bleeding complications in the dabigatran group compared with the warfarin group. Valve thrombus was observed in all study groups. Any conclusions regarding the rate of thrombus formation are outside the scope of this study and merit further investigation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schomburg et al. (2012) studied Mechanical mitral valve replacement (n=19). Dabigatran vs. Warfarin (5 mg QD, adjusted to INR 2.0-2.5) or no anticoagulation was evaluated on animal mortality (p=0.017). Dabigatran significantly improved survival compared to warfarin and no anticoagulation after mechanical mitral valve replacement in a swine model (average survival 50.3 vs 15.6 and 18.7 days; p=0.017).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a156d1579ff98d0de4e9e33https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2011.616256
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper