PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1973Heart128 citationsOpen Access

Estimation of left ventricular size by echocardiography.

DGD G Gibson

Key Result

Echocardiographic estimation of left ventricular volume correlated strongly with angiocardiography (r=0.91), though lack of fit occurred in patients with abnormal left ventricular cavity shape.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=50)

Structured PICO

Does echocardiography accurately estimate left ventricular size compared to angiocardiography?

P
Population
50 patients
I
Intervention
Echocardiography (measuring the distance from the endocardial surface of the posterior wall of the left ventricle to the posterior surface of the interventricular septum)
C
Comparator
Angiocardiography (derived from biplane Elema films)
O
Outcome
Left ventricular volume and dimensionsurrogate

Echocardiography provides a reliable estimate of left ventricular volume compared to angiography, though accuracy is reduced in patients with abnormal left ventricular cavity shapes.

Main Result

Effect estimate: r=0.91

Limitations

  • Lack of fit between the two methods occurred in patients in whom left ventricular cavity shape was abnormal.
  • Significant differences between measurements at end-systole and end-diastole, and in atrial fibrillation vs sinus rhythm.
  • Lack of fit between the two methods occurred in patients in whom left ventricular cavity shape was abnormal

Abstract

A comparison of echocardiography with angiocardiography in estimating left ventricular dimensions was undertaken in ₅o patients. Angiographic data were derived from biplane Elema films, and echocardiography was used to measure the distance from the endocardial surface of the posterior wall of the left ventricle to the posterior surface of the interventricular septum. Left ventricular volume, calculated as the cube of the echo- cardiographic dimension, was related to that derivedfrom angiography (r= o 9I, standard error of the estimate 6i ml). In 32 patients, duplicate determinations of both angiographic and echocardiographic measurements were available, allowing the experimental error of each to be estimated. In this group, the echocardiographic dimension was shown to be similar in magnitude to, but not identical with, the mean minor axis measured by angiography. Lack offit between the two methods occurred in patients in whom left ventricular cavity shape was abnormal. There were also significant differences between the two measurements at end-systole and enddiastole, and between patients in atrialfibrillation compared with those in sinus rhythm. Comparison ofresidual values in the same patient between observed and predicted dimensions at end-systole and end-diastole showed a significant relation between the two.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

D G Gibson (1973) conducted an observational in Patients requiring left ventricular dimension estimation (n=50). Echocardiography vs. Angiocardiography was evaluated on Correlation of left ventricular volume estimation (r=0.91). Echocardiographic estimation of left ventricular volume correlated strongly with angiocardiography (r=0.91), though lack of fit occurred in patients with abnormal left ventricular cavity shape.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1577f9d64fa333899fb475https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.35.2.128
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper