PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 9, 2008American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine12 citations

Gender Differences in Cardiorespiratory Fitness With Advancing Age: Is the Age-Associated Decline in VO2max More Rapid in Men and Do Older Men and Women Respond Differently to Exercise?

View Full Paper
RZRobert F. Zoeller

Key Result

Regular vigorous exercise can slow the rate of decline in VO2max by as much as 50%, although the absolute age-associated decline is greater in men than women.

Key Points

  • The aim is to examine how age-related declines in VO2max differ between genders and the impact of exercise.
  • Analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinal data on VO2max in older men and women.
  • Comparison of exercise levels and their association with aerobic power declines.
  • Evaluation of gender-specific physiological adaptations to exercise training.
  • Men experience a greater absolute decline in VO2max (L or mL/min) than women, but relative declines equalize per decade.
  • Regular vigorous exercise can slow VO2max decline by up to 50%, while stopping or reducing training accelerates the decline.
  • Strong correlation observed between declines in maximal heart rate and VO2max, with minimal impact from physical activity on heart rate.

Structured PICO

Does aerobic exercise training improve VO2max differently in older men and women?

P
Population
Men and women experiencing age-associated decline in cardiorespiratory fitness
I
Intervention
Aerobic exercise training and physical activity
O
Outcome
Age-associated decline in VO2maxsurrogate

Aerobic exercise improves fitness in both older men and women, but the physiological adaptations differ by gender.

Limitations

  • Selection bias in cross-sectional studies may report a slower rate of decline than longitudinal studies
  • Reduction or cessation of training with advancing age may result in a misleading acceleration in decline
  • Selection bias in cross-sectional studies
  • Misleading acceleration in decline due to reduction or cessation of training with advancing age in longitudinal studies

Abstract

Both cross-sectional and longitudinal data suggest that the age-associated decline in VO 2max is greater in men when expressed in absolute terms such as L or mL· min —1 . When expressed in relative terms (ie, percentage decline per decade), the apparent gender difference disappears. Cross-sectional studies report a slower rate of decline than longitudinal studies, probably due to selection bias. The impact of physical activity on the rate of decline in aerobic power with age is not entirely clear. Meta-analyses of cross-sectional studies did not find increased levels of physical activity to be associated with lower rates of decline in VO 2max . Longitudinal studies suggest that regular vigorous exercise can slow the rate of decline in VO 2max by as much as 50%, but the reduction or cessation of training with advancing age may result in a misleading acceleration in that decline. The most consistent finding in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies is a strong association between the age-associated declines in maximal heart rate and VO 2max , but physical activity has little, if any, impact on maximal heart rate. Aerobic exercise training of sufficient intensity can increase aerobic power in both men and women, but the mechanisms may be different, with men demonstrating a greater improvement in factors related to stroke volume and cardiac output, whereas the adaptations in women appear to be more dependent on increased oxygen extraction by skeletal muscle.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Robert F. Zoeller (2008) conducted a review in Age-associated decline in cardiorespiratory fitness. Aerobic exercise training / Physical activity was evaluated on Age-associated decline in VO2max. Regular vigorous exercise can slow the rate of decline in VO2max by as much as 50%, although the absolute age-associated decline is greater in men than women.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a157e4da2f71238514e7b1ahttps://doi.org/10.1177/1559827608323631
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper