PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 28, 2010Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging406 citationsOpen Access

Real‐time diffusion‐perfusion mismatch analysis in acute stroke

View Full Paper
MSMatús StrakaGAGregory W. AlbersRBRoland Bammer

Key Points

  • This research focuses on improving acute stroke diagnosis and treatment through real-time assessment of diffusion-perfusion mismatch.
  • Developed RAPID, an automated system for processing perfusion and diffusion data.
  • Evaluated performance on 63 acute stroke cases using human reader comparisons.
  • Determined DWI/PWI mismatch through infarct core and perfusion deficit segmentation.
  • RAPID achieved r(2) = 0.99 for DWI and r(2) = 0.96 for PWI lesion volume correlation.
  • Mismatch identification showed 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity.
  • Mismatch information can be provided in 5-7 minutes via hospital PACS.

Abstract

Diffusion-perfusion mismatch can be used to identify acute stroke patients that could benefit from reperfusion therapies. Early assessment of the mismatch facilitates necessary diagnosis and treatment decisions in acute stroke. We developed the RApid processing of PerfusIon and Diffusion (RAPID) for unsupervised, fully automated processing of perfusion and diffusion data for the purpose of expedited routine clinical assessment. The RAPID system computes quantitative perfusion maps (cerebral blood volume, CBV; cerebral blood flow, CBF; mean transit time, MTT; and the time until the residue function reaches its peak, T(max)) using deconvolution of tissue and arterial signals. Diffusion-weighted imaging/perfusion-weighted imaging (DWI/PWI) mismatch is automatically determined using infarct core segmentation of ADC maps and perfusion deficits segmented from T(max) maps. The performance of RAPID was evaluated on 63 acute stroke cases, in which diffusion and perfusion lesion volumes were outlined by both a human reader and the RAPID system. The correlation of outlined lesion volumes obtained from both methods was r(2) = 0.99 for DWI and r(2) = 0.96 for PWI. For mismatch identification, RAPID showed 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity. The mismatch information is made available on the hospital's PACS within 5-7 min. Results indicate that the automated system is sufficiently accurate and fast enough to be used for routine care as well as in clinical trials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Straka et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15914a814bf8ec9a4ec6cdhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22338
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper