PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 15, 2025International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention1 citationsOpen Access

Prognostic impact of angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

TKTakayuki KawamuraKMKoichiro MatsumuraHMHaruka Minami

Key Result

The combined presence of late gadolinium enhancement and angio-IMR > 45 U increased the risk of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization (HR 12.20) in dilated cardiomyopathy patients.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=108)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

P
Population
108 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (LVEF < 50%, absence of significant coronary artery disease), median age 63, 27% women, from a single center in Japan.
I
Intervention
Assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction using angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio-IMR) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
O
Outcome
Composite endpoints of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization within 3 years.composite

The combination of late gadolinium enhancement and high angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance is a strong independent predictor of mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 12.20 (95% CI 2.40-62.10)

Absolute Event Rate: 41.2% vs 4.3%

p-value: p=0.001

Limitations

  • Retrospective, single-centre design and small sample size
  • Angio-IMR does not directly assess coronary microcirculation
  • Absence of a clearly defined angio-IMR cutoff point
  • Arrhythmia burden, myocardial strain analysis, and genetic testing were not evaluated
  • Absence of other risk stratification factors such as arrhythmia burden, myocardial strain analysis, and genetic testing

Abstract

Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) has recently been associated with adverse cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure. We investigated the relationship between late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and CMD, as well as the prognostic value of CMD in predicting long-term prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Methods: Patients with DCM who underwent both cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and coronary angiography were consecutively enrolled. CMD was evaluated using the angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio-IMR). The primary endpoint was composite endpoints of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization within 3 years. Results: Among 108 patients (median age, 64 years; women, 27 %), 18 % (19 patients) experienced composite endpoints. The median angio-IMR was 45 U, and LGE was identified in 23 %. Angio-IMR was significantly higher in patients with LGE than in those without LGE. When patients were stratified based on the combined presence of LGE and angio-IMR, significant differences in composite endpoints were observed among the three groups (LGE absence and low angio-IMR: 4.3 % vs. LGE presence or high angio-IMR: 22.2 % vs. LGE presence and high angio-IMR: 41.2 %, log-rank test p 45 U was an independent predictor: hazards ratio 12.20, 95 % confidence interval 2.40-62.10, p = 0.001. Conclusion: CMD evaluated using angio-IMR was associated with LGE and long-term prognosis in patients with DCM. Further investigations are needed to elucidate the relationship among CMD, LGE, and prognosis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kawamura et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=108). Combined presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and angio-IMR > 45 U vs. LGE absence and low angio-IMR was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization within 3 years (HR 12.20, 95% CI 2.40-62.10, p=0.001). The combined presence of late gadolinium enhancement and angio-IMR > 45 U increased the risk of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization (HR 12.20) in dilated cardiomyopathy patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15979c79ff98d0de4edb62https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200467
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper