PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2005Journal of Political Economy866 citations

International Migration, Self‐Selection, and the Distribution of Wages: Evidence from Mexico and the United States

View Full Paper
DCDaniel ChiquiarGHGordon Hanson

Key Points

  • The study examines whether less skilled workers are more likely to migrate from Mexico to the U.S. by testing the negative-selection hypothesis.
  • Analyzed data from the 1990 and 2000 population censuses of Mexico and the U.S.
  • Compared educational levels of Mexican immigrants in the U.S. with nonmigrants in Mexico.
  • Evaluated wage distributions based on current skill prices in Mexico.
  • Mexican immigrants in the U.S. are more educated than nonmigrants in Mexico.
  • If paid according to Mexico's skill prices, immigrants would fall in the middle of the wage distribution.
  • Findings contradict the negative-selection hypothesis, indicating intermediate selection.

Abstract

We use the 1990 and 2000 Mexican and U.S. population censuses to test Borjas's negative‐selection hypothesis that the less skilled are those most likely to migrate from countries with high skill premia/earnings inequality to countries with low skill premia/earnings inequality. We find that Mexican immigrants in the United States are more educated than nonmigrants in Mexico; and were Mexican immigrants to be paid according to current skill prices in Mexico, they would be concentrated in the middle of Mexico's wage distribution. These results are inconsistent with the negative‐selection hypothesis and instead suggest that there is intermediate selection of immigrants from Mexico.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chiquiar et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15a2275347fbb173a0126dhttps://doi.org/10.1086/427464
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper