PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 2010Housing Theory and Society101 citationsOpen Access

Sceptical, Disorderly and Paradoxical Subjects: Problematizing the “Will to Empower” in Social Housing Governance

KMKim McKee

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Drawing on focus group research with social housing tenants this paper illustrates that despite the existence of a political “will to empower” within housing stock transfer policy in Scotland, the effects of governmental strategies are only ever partial and uneven, and may be subject to challenge and contestation from below. Through a focus on “lay” perspectives and the contested nature of contemporary governing practices, the paper argues for more attention to the messy realities of governing within specific local contexts, especially the way in which governable subjects can think and act otherwise, and forge their own alternative govern‐mentalities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim McKee (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15b0fca2352da34782cabbhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14036091003788120
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Post-Foucauldian governmentality: What does it offer critical social policy analysis?2009 · 369 citations
  2. 2Logics of Empowerment: Development, Gender, and Governance in Neoliberal India2008 · 496 citations
  3. 3Sovereignty, biopolitics and the local government of crime in Britain2005 · 143 citations
  4. 4Case and Situation Analysis1983 · 1,010 citations
  5. 5Transferring Glasgow’s council housing: financial, urban and housing policy implications2003 · 36 citations