PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 27, 2009PROTEOMICS101 citationsOpen Access

Improving sensitivity in proteome studies by analysis of false discovery rates for multiple search engines

View Full Paper
AJAndrew R. JonesJSJennifer A. SiepenSHSimon J. Hubbard

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

LC-MS experiments can generate large quantities of data, for which a variety of database search engines are available to make peptide and protein identifications. Decoy databases are becoming widely used to place statistical confidence in result sets, allowing the false discovery rate (FDR) to be estimated. Different search engines produce different identification sets so employing more than one search engine could result in an increased number of peptides (and proteins) being identified, if an appropriate mechanism for combining data can be defined. We have developed a search engine independent score, based on FDR, which allows peptide identifications from different search engines to be combined, called the FDR Score. The results demonstrate that the observed FDR is significantly different when analysing the set of identifications made by all three search engines, by each pair of search engines or by a single search engine. Our algorithm assigns identifications to groups according to the set of search engines that have made the identification, and re-assigns the score (combined FDR Score). The combined FDR Score can differentiate between correct and incorrect peptide identifications with high accuracy, allowing on average 35% more peptide identifications to be made at a fixed FDR than using a single search engine.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jones et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15c1cc79ff98d0de4f157ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200800473
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Posterior Error Probabilities and False Discovery Rates: Two Sides of the Same Coin2007 · 310 citations
  2. 2ABRF-PRG04: differentiation of protein isoforms.2007 · 13 citations
  3. 3A Method for Assessing the Statistical Significance of Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Identifications Using General Scoring Schemes2003 · 497 citations
  4. 4Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data1999 · 8,321 citations
  5. 5Comparative Evaluation of Tandem MS Search Algorithms Using a Target-Decoy Search Strategy2007 · 142 citations