PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2020Journal of Affective Disorders165 citationsOpen Access

Development and validation of a machine learning algorithm for predicting the risk of postpartum depression among pregnant women

View Full Paper
YZYiye ZhangSWShuojia WangAHAlison Hermann

Key Points

  • To create a machine learning framework that predicts postpartum depression (PPD) risk using electronic health record (EHR) data.
  • Utilized two EHR datasets with 15,197 and 53,972 women for development and validation respectively.
  • Constructed a PPD risk prediction model focusing on clinical features associated with mental health.
  • Evaluated model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in both datasets.
  • Best model achieved an AUC of 0.937 (95% CI 0.912 - 0.962) in the development group.
  • Validation model's AUC was 0.886 (95% CI 0.879 - 0.893), indicating robust predictive performance.
  • Model remained effective across different time periods of pregnancy and childbirth.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is a scarcity in tools to predict postpartum depression (PPD). We propose a machine learning framework for PPD risk prediction using data extracted from electronic health records (EHRs). METHODS: Two EHR datasets containing data on 15,197 women from 2015 to 2018 at a single site, and 53,972 women from 2004 to 2017 at multiple sites were used as development and validation sets, respectively, to construct the PPD risk prediction model. The primary outcome was a diagnosis of PPD within 1 year following childbirth. A framework of data extraction, processing, and machine learning was implemented to select a minimal list of features from the EHR datasets to ensure model performance and to enable future point-of-care risk prediction. RESULTS: The best-performing model uses from clinical features related to mental health history, medical comorbidity, obstetric complications, medication prescription orders, and patient demographic characteristics. The model performances as measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) are 0.937 (95% CI 0.912 - 0.962) and 0.886 (95% CI 0.879-0.893) in the development and validation datasets, respectively. The model performances were consistent when tested using data ending at multiple time periods during pregnancy and at childbirth. LIMITATIONS: The prevalence of PPD in the study data represented a treatment prevalence and is likely lower than the illness prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: EHRs and machine learning offer the ability to identify women at risk for PPD early in their pregnancy. This may facilitate scalable and timely prevention and intervention, reducing negative outcomes and the associated burden.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15c440814bf8ec9a4f048bhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.113
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Relationship Between Palpitation and Mental Health2015 · 22 citations
  2. 2Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning2007 · 22,083 citations
  3. 3The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.1982 · 22,127 citations
  4. 4Improving the Collection of Race, Ethnicity, and Language Data to Reduce Healthcare Disparities: A Case Study from an Academic Medical Center.2016 · 33 citations
  5. 5Perinatal Major Depression Biomarkers: A systematic review2016 · 164 citations