PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 2009Basic Research in Cardiology92 citationsOpen Access

Coronary microvascular resistance: methods for its quantification in humans

PKPaul KnaapenPCPaolo G. CamiciKMKoen Marques

Key Result

Positron emission tomography remains the unrivalled noninvasive imaging modality for absolute quantification of coronary microvascular resistance, while invasive methods are preferred in patients with epicardial obstructive disease.

PICO

P
Population
Coronary microvascular dysfunction
I
Intervention / Comparator
Quantification methods for coronary microvascular resistance

Limitations

  • Invasive methods do not account for collateral flow and overestimate actual microvascular resistance.
  • PET suffers from limited availability, high costs, and exposure to ionizing radiation.
  • CMR requires large doses of gadolinium which can be toxic, and post-processing is time-consuming.
  • MCE has technical concerns regarding poor acoustic windows and safety debates regarding microbubble contrast agents.

Abstract

Coronary microvascular dysfunction is a topic that has recently gained considerable interest in the medical community owing to the growing awareness that microvascular dysfunction occurs in a number of myocardial disease states and has important prognostic implications. With this growing awareness, comes the desire to accurately assess the functional capacity of the coronary microcirculation for diagnostic purposes as well as to monitor the effects of therapeutic interventions that are targeted at reversing the extent of coronary microvascular dysfunction. Measurements of coronary microvascular resistance play a pivotal role in achieving that goal and several invasive and noninvasive methods have been developed for its quantification. This review is intended to provide an update pertaining to the methodology of these different imaging techniques, including the discussion of their strengths and weaknesses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Knaapen et al. (2009) conducted a review in Coronary microvascular dysfunction. Quantification methods for coronary microvascular resistance was evaluated. Positron emission tomography remains the unrivalled noninvasive imaging modality for absolute quantification of coronary microvascular resistance, while invasive methods are preferred in patients with epicardial obstructive disease.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15da2d1362a77db8e3c511https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-009-0037-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper