PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1988Heart22 citationsOpen Access

Correction of left ventricular asynchrony by coronary artery surgery.

DGD G GibsonRGR. GreenbaumRPR B Pridie

Structured PICO

Does coronary artery bypass grafting improve regional left ventricular wall motion asynchrony in patients with coronary artery disease?

P
Population
27 patients undergoing coronary artery surgery
I
Intervention
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
C
Comparator
Preoperative baseline (within-subject comparison)
O
Outcome
Timing of regional left ventricular wall motion (asynchrony of wall motion during ejection)surrogate

Coronary artery bypass grafting significantly reduces left ventricular wall motion asynchrony during ejection, suggesting this abnormality reflects impaired coronary blood flow.

Abstract

To investigate the effect of coronary artery bypass grafting on the timing of regional left ventricular wall motion, contrast left ventriculograms from 27 patients were digitised frame by frame before and after operation. End diastolic and end systolic volumes, ejection fraction, and peak ejection and filling rates showed no significant change. The commonest preoperative abnormality was delayed onset of inward wall motion during ejection, which was present in 14 patients over 10% (range 5-40%) of the cavity outline, leading to a pattern of "diagonal contours". After operation this pattern had resolved completely in 12 patients and partially in two. Minor abnormalities appeared postoperatively in five but overall the mean (1SD) area affected was reduced by 5 (8)%. The time span between the onset of inward motion in different regions of the cavity also fell significantly after surgery from 190 (50) to 130 (50) ms. Regional hypokinesis (6 cases) and abnormal wall motion during isovolumic contraction (4 cases) or isovolumic relaxation (5 cases) were not consistently affected. Thus successful coronary artery surgery is without consistent effect on overall left ventricular function, overall hypokinesis, or abnormal wall motion during the isovolumic periods. It does, however, strikingly reduce the asynchrony of wall motion during ejection, suggesting that before operation this abnormality may directly reflect impaired coronary blood flow. The results emphasise the potential value of analysing regional wall motion to elucidate functional abnormalities associated with coronary artery disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gibson et al. (1988) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1607dfc4bcdd6cffc5b881https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.59.3.304
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Influence of Aortocoronary Bypass Surgery on Left Ventricular Performance1971 · 204 citations
  2. 2Left Ventricular Pressure-Volume Alterations and Regional Disorders of Contraction During Myocardial Ischemia Induced by Atrial Pacing1970 · 259 citations
  3. 3Measurement of peak rates of left ventricular wall movement in man. Comparison of echocardiography with angiography.1975 · 94 citations
  4. 4Estimation of Left Ventricular Volume by One-Plane Cineangiography1967 · 450 citations
  5. 5Regional left ventricular wall movement in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.1978 · 31 citations