PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 30, 2025Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine3 citationsOpen Access

Impact of hypotension prediction index-guided management on intraoperative hypotension and postoperative outcomes in abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

View Full Paper
JRJavier Ripollés‐MelchorAZAndrés Zorrilla‐VacaÁEÁngel Espinosa

Key Result

HPI-guided management did not significantly improve postoperative complications (OR 1.10; 95% CI 0.83-1.46), acute kidney injury, mortality, or length of stay in adults undergoing abdominal surgery.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=1,534)

Blinding

Unblinded

Structured PICO

Does Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI)-guided management improve postoperative outcomes in adults undergoing major abdominal surgery?

P
Population
8 RCTs involving 1534 adults undergoing major abdominal surgery
I
Intervention
Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI)-guided management
C
Comparator
Standard care
O
Outcome
Postoperative complications, acute kidney injury (AKI), perioperative mortality, and hospital length of stay (LOS)hard clinical

HPI-guided management reduces intraoperative hypotension metrics but does not significantly improve patient-centered postoperative outcomes such as AKI, complications, or mortality in major abdominal surgery.

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 1.10 (95% CI 0.83-1.46)

Limitations

  • lack of blinding
  • high risk of bias
  • Lack of blinding
  • High risk of bias

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) is a machine-learning algorithm designed to predict hypotension. by maintaining mean arterial pressure (MAP) above 65 mmHg. This meta-analysis evaluated whether HPI-guided management improves postoperative outcomes and included post hoc analyses of intraoperative hypotension (IOH) metrics in adults undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases identified randomized controlled trials comparing HPI-guided management with standard care. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, acute kidney injury (AKI), perioperative mortality, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Post hoc analyses assessed IOH metrics, including time-weighted average (TWA) of MAP < 65 mmHg, area under the threshold (AUT), total time with MAP < 65 mmHg, and intraoperative fluid use. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models to calculate pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs), odds ratios (ORs), and mean differences (MDs). RESULTS: Eight trials involving 1534 patients were included. No significant differences were observed for AKI (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.64-1.13), postoperative complications (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.83-1.46), mortality (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.32-2.83), LOS (SMD: -0.15; 95% CI: -0.73 to 0.42), or fluid use (SMD: -0.06; 95% CI: -0.35 to 0.24). HPI reduced TWA MAP < 65 mmHg (SMD: -0.25; MD: -20.5 min), AUT (SMD: -0.83), and total time with MAP < 65 mmHg (SMD: -0.74). CONCLUSIONS: HPI-guided management did not significantly improve patient-centered outcomes. Post hoc analyses indicated a reduction in IOH metrics, but the clinical relevance of these findings remains uncertain given the lack of blinding and high risk of bias. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42023490654.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ripollés‐Melchor et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in major abdominal surgery (n=1,534). Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI)-guided management vs. standard care was evaluated on postoperative complications (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.83-1.46). HPI-guided management did not significantly improve postoperative complications (OR 1.10; 95% CI 0.83-1.46), acute kidney injury, mortality, or length of stay in adults undergoing abdominal surgery.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a160c9e9a0ac003cd6b4f37https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101656
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper